The Registration of Special Notarial Bonds under the Security by Means of Movable Property Act and the Publicity Principle: Lessons from Developments in Belgium

Регистрация специальных нотариальных залогов в соответствии с Законом о гарантии посредством движимого имущества и принципом гласности: уроки развития событий в Бельгии
Lefa Sebolaisi Ntsoane
2018-01-19

Electronic Pledge Register (Belgian Pledge Act)Security by Means of Movable Property Act 57 of 1993non-possessory pledge / pledge without possessionpublicity principlespecial notarial bonds
Many people do not own immovable property to offer as security but do have movable property which can be offered as security for the repayment of a debt. In today’s world where the costs of a motor car can exceed that of a house, the increasing value of movable things makes it a popular and appropriate security object. Under the common law pledge, delivery of the movable property from the pledgor (debtor) to the pledgee (creditor) has to take place in order for the pledgee to acquire a real security right in the property. Delivery of the property is aimed at ensuring compliance with the publicity principle. The principle of publicity entails that the existence of a real security must be known to the public. With the aim to promote commerce, certain countries have taken the initiative in reforming their laws on pledge to allow the debtor to retain possession of the movable property that serves as security. Furthermore, technology has advanced to a level where national registration systems which can be accessed easily and at minimal costs can be established. The South African legislature enacted the Security by Means of Movable Property Act 57 of 1993 which makes provision for a pledge without possession. This Act deemed a duly registered notarial bond over specified movable property to have been delivered as if delivery has in fact taken place thereby substituted the common law delivery requirement with registration in the Deeds Office. On 30 May 2013, the Belgian House of Representatives adopted a Belgian Pledge Act which allows for a non-possessory pledge on movable property subject to registration in a newly created public register called the Electronic Pledge Register. This article therefore examines the efficacy of the registration system of special notarial bonds in South African law and whether this form of registration complies with the publicity principle looking at the developments of a computerised registration system taking place in Belgium.
1
Belgium adopted a 2013 Pledge Act permitting non-possessory pledges registered in an Electronic Pledge Register, prompting evaluation of South Africa's notarial bond registration efficacy against computerized systems.
2
Common law pledge requires delivery to satisfy the publicity principle, making real security visible to the public.
3
Movable property has become an important and appropriate object of security as its value (e.g., motor cars) can exceed immovable property.
4
Some jurisdictions reformed pledge law to allow non-possessory pledges, substituting delivery with registration to promote commerce.
5
South Africa's Security by Means of Movable Property Act 57 of 1993 treats a duly registered special notarial bond as equivalent to delivery via Deeds Office registration.

Registration system for special notarial bonds over movable property under the Security by Means of Movable Property Act (South Africa) and the Electronic Pledge Register (Belgium)

Compliance of non-possessory notarial bond registration with the publicity principle, i.e., whether registration effectively substitutes delivery to create and publicize real security rights in movable property

Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-01-19
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Lefa Sebolaisi Ntsoane
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%