Index insurance and climate risk management: Addressing social equity
Индексное страхование и управление климатическими рисками: обеспечение социальной справедливости
2018-06-04
SCID: 54.1/762jubfe
Discuss with AI
climate risk managementdistributive justiceindex insurancepro-poor insurancesocial equity
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Abstract Fair distribution of benefits from index insurance matters. Lack of attention to social equity can reinforce inequalities and undermine the potential index insurance holds as a tool for climate risk management that is also pro‐poor. The aims of this article are to: (a) examine social equity concerns raised by index insurance in the context of climate risk management, (b) consider how greater attention can be paid to social equity in index insurance initiatives, and (c) reflect on the policy challenges raised by taking social equity into account as a mechanism for climate risk reduction. The article draws on learning from the CGIAR 's Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security ( CCAFS ) and presents the cases of the Index Based Livelihoods Insurance ( IBLI ) and Agriculture and Climate Risk Enterprise Ltd. ( ACRE ) in East Africa. It proposes a framework for unpacking social equity related to equitable access, procedures, representation and distribution within index insurance schemes. The framework facilitates identification of opportunities for building outcomes that are more equitable, with greater potential for inclusion and fairer distribution of benefits related to index insurance. The article argues that systematically addressing social equity raises hard policy choices for index insurance initiatives without straightforward solutions. Attention to how benefits and burdens of index insurance are distributed, suggests the unpalatable truth for development policy that the poorest members of rural society can be excluded. Nevertheless, a focus on social equity—facilitated by the framework—opens up opportunities to ensure index insurance is linked to more socially just climate risk management. At the very least, it may prevent index insurance from generating greater inequality. Taking social equity into account, thus, shifts the focus from agricultural systems in transition per se to systems with potential to incorporate societal transformation through distributive justice.
Key Findings
1
An equity-focused approach shifts attention from agricultural transition alone toward distributive justice and broader societal transformation.
2
Assessing how index insurance benefits and burdens are distributed can prevent schemes from worsening inequality and support more socially just climate risk management.
3
Systematically addressing social equity exposes difficult policy trade-offs because the poorest rural groups may be excluded from index insurance schemes.
4
The article examines how social equity affects index insurance’s potential as a pro-poor instrument for climate risk management.
5
Using lessons from CCAFS and East African IBLI and ACRE cases, it proposes a framework covering equitable access, procedures, representation, and benefit distribution.
Research Object
Index insurance schemes for climate risk management in East African agricultural and livelihood systems
Research Subject
Social equity in access, procedures, representation, and distribution of benefits and burdens within index insurance initiatives, including implications for inclusion, inequality, and pro-poor climate risk reduction
Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-06-04
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest