Comparison of Polyethylene Glycol 3350 and Lactulose for Treatment of Chronic Constipation in Children

Сравнение полиэтиленгликоля 3350 и лактулозы при лечении хронического запора у детей
David A. Gremse, Jamie Hixon, Alysia Crutchfield
2002-05-01

ChildrenChronic constipationColonic transit timeLactulosePolyethylene glycol 3350
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 and lactulose were compared in an unblinded, randomized, crossover design for treatment of constipation in 37 children aged 2 to 16 years. Subjects received lactulose (1.3 g/kg/d divided twice daily up to 20 g) or PEG 3350 (10 g/m2/day) for 2 weeks. PEG 3350 significantly decreased the total colonic transit time compared to lactulose (47.6+/-2.7 vs 55.3+/-2.4 hours, mean +/- SE, PEG 3350 vs lactulose, respectively, p = 0.038). The stool frequency, form, and the ease of passage were similar for each laxative. Polyethylene glycol 3350 is an effective laxative for the treatment of chronic constipation in children.
1
An unblinded randomized crossover study compared PEG 3350 and lactulose in 37 children aged 2–16 years with chronic constipation.
2
PEG 3350 significantly reduced total colonic transit time compared with lactulose: 47.6 versus 55.3 hours (p = 0.038).
3
PEG 3350 was effective for treating chronic constipation in children over the two-week treatment periods.
4
Stool frequency, consistency, and ease of passage were similar between PEG 3350 and lactulose.

children aged 2–16 years with chronic constipation treated with polyethylene glycol 3350 or lactulose

Comparative laxative effectiveness, including total colonic transit time, stool frequency, stool form, and ease of passage

Publication Details
Publication Date
2002-05-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
David A. Gremse
Jamie Hixon
Alysia Crutchfield
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%