Collective Labor Disputes and Strikes in Russia: The Impact of Judicial Precedents and Enforcement

Коллективные трудовые споры и забастовки в России: влияние судебных прецедентов и правоприменения
Елена Герасимова
2017-01-01

collective labor disputesenforcement of labor legislationjudicial precedentsright to strike
The right to strike is recognized in the Constitution and the Labor Code of the Russian Federation as a means to resolve collective labor disputes. However, in Russia labor protests come up for discussion much more frequently than strikes. In recent years the number of labor protests in Russia, including various forms of work stoppage, has increased significantly compared to previous years, but the number of legally constituted collective labor disputes and strikes has remained very low. The legislation on resolution of collective labor disputes and mounting strikes is quite restrictive in Russia, and its enforcement also encourages employees to seek alternative ways to settle collective labor conflicts. There is little empirical research on the judicial implementation of these norms and its influence on the enforcement of legislation. Therefore, this paper analyses the reasoning of courts in cases on the legality of strikes, their interpretations of the law, and the impact these decisions have on the enforcement of the legislation on resolution of collective labor disputes and strikes. Our conclusion is that the courts act as another restrictive influence on the resolution of collective labor disputes and the exercise of the right to strike in Russia.
1
Although the constitution and Labor Code recognize the right to strike, actual legally constituted strikes in Russia remain very low.
2
Labor protests and various forms of work stoppage have increased significantly in recent years, while formal collective labor disputes and strikes stayed rare.
3
Russian legislation on resolving collective labor disputes and mounting strikes is quite restrictive, prompting employees to use alternative dispute methods.
4
The paper concludes that courts function as an additional restrictive influence on resolving collective labor disputes and on exercising the right to strike in Russia.
5
There is little empirical research on judicial implementation of strike-related norms, so this paper analyzes court reasoning and legal interpretations in strike legality cases.

Courts' legal reasoning in cases on the legality of strikes in Russia

Impact of judicial interpretations and decisions on enforcement of legislation governing resolution of collective labor disputes and the right to strike

Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Елена Герасимова
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%