Functional connectivity underlying cognitive and psychiatric symptoms in post-COVID-19 syndrome: is anosognosia a key determinant?

Idris Guessous, Karl‐Olof Lövblad, Frédéric Assal, Gilles Allali, Patrice H. Lalive, Basile N. Landis, Dimitri Van De Ville, Alessandra Griffa, Mayssam Nehme, Olivia Braillard, Jérôme Pugin, Philippe Voruz, Alexandre Cionca, Isabele Jacot de Alcântara, Anthony Nuber‐Champier, Lamyae Benzakour, Matteo Coen, Jacques Serratrice, Dan Adler, Julie Péron, Marine Thomasson
2022-03-01

Abstract Lack of awareness of cognitive impairment (i.e. anosognosia) could be a key factor for distinguishing between neuropsychological post-COVID-19 condition phenotypes. In this context, the 2-fold aim of the present study was to (i) establish the prevalence of anosognosia for memory impairment, according to the severity of the infection in the acute phase and (ii) determine whether anosognosic patients with post-COVID syndrome have a different cognitive and psychiatric profile from nosognosic patients, with associated differences in brain functional connectivity. A battery of neuropsychological, psychiatric, olfactory, dyspnoea, fatigue and quality-of-life tests was administered 227.07 ± 42.69 days post-SARS-CoV-2 infection to 102 patients (mean age: 56.35 years, 65 men, no history of neurological, psychiatric, neuro-oncological or neurodevelopmental disorder prior to infection) who had experienced either a mild (not hospitalized; n = 45), moderate (conventional hospitalization; n = 34) or severe (hospitalization with intensive care unit stay and mechanical ventilation; n = 23) presentation in the acute phase. Patients were first divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of anosognosia for memory deficits (26 anosognosic patients and 76 nosognosic patients). Of these, 49 patients underwent an MRI. Structural images were visually analysed, and statistical intergroup analyses were then performed on behavioural and functional connectivity measures. Only 15.6% of patients who presented mild disease displayed anosognosia for memory dysfunction, compared with 32.4% of patients with moderate presentation and 34.8% of patients with severe disease. Compared with nosognosic patients, those with anosognosia for memory dysfunction performed significantly more poorly on objective cognitive and olfactory measures. By contrast, they gave significantly more positive subjective assessments of their quality of life, psychiatric status and fatigue. Interestingly, the proportion of patients exhibiting a lack of consciousness of olfactory deficits was significantly higher in the anosognosic group. Functional connectivity analyses revealed a significant decrease in connectivity, in the anosognosic group as compared with the nosognosic group, within and between the following networks: the left default mode, the bilateral somatosensory motor, the right executive control, the right salient ventral attention and the bilateral dorsal attention networks, as well as the right Lobules IV and V of the cerebellum. Lack of awareness of cognitive disorders and, to a broader extent, impairment of the self-monitoring brain system, may be a key factor for distinguishing between the clinical phenotypes of post-COVID syndrome with neuropsychological deficits.
Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-03-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
73
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Idris Guessous
Karl‐Olof Lövblad
Frédéric Assal
Gilles Allali
Patrice H. Lalive
Basile N. Landis
Dimitri Van De Ville
Alessandra Griffa
Mayssam Nehme
Olivia Braillard
Jérôme Pugin
Philippe Voruz
Alexandre Cionca
Isabele Jacot de Alcântara
Anthony Nuber‐Champier
Lamyae Benzakour
Matteo Coen
Jacques Serratrice
Dan Adler
Julie Péron
Marine Thomasson
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%