Survival in Very Preterm Infants: An International Comparison of 10 National Neonatal Networks

Stellan Håkansson, Tetsuya Isayama, Satoshi Kusuda, Brian Reichman, Liisa Lehtonen, Kei Lui, Mark Adams, Neena Modi, Kjell Helenius, Dirk Bassler, Prakesh S. Shah, Brian A. Darlow, Gunnar Sjörs, Naho Morisaki, Máximo Vento, Shoo K. Lee, Franca Rusconi, on behalf of the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes (iNeo) of Neonates
2017-11-21

OBJECTIVES: To compare survival rates and age at death among very preterm infants in 10 national and regional neonatal networks. METHODS: A cohort study of very preterm infants, born between 24 and 29 weeks' gestation and weighing <1500 g, admitted to participating neonatal units between 2007 and 2013 in the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of Neonates. Survival was compared by using standardized ratios (SRs) comparing survival in each network to the survival estimate of the whole population. RESULTS: Network populations differed with respect to rates of cesarean birth, exposure to antenatal steroids and birth in nontertiary hospitals. Network SRs for survival were highest in Japan (SR: 1.10; 99% confidence interval: 1.08-1.13) and lowest in Spain (SR: 0.88; 99% confidence interval: 0.85-0.90). The overall survival differed from 78% to 93% among networks, the difference being highest at 24 weeks' gestation (range 35%-84%). Survival rates increased and differences between networks diminished with increasing gestational age (GA) (range 92%-98% at 29 weeks' gestation); yet, relative differences in survival followed a similar pattern at all GAs. The median age at death varied from 4 days to 13 days across networks. CONCLUSIONS: The network ranking of survival rates for very preterm infants remained largely unchanged as GA increased; however, survival rates showed marked variations at lower GAs. The median age at death also varied among networks. These findings warrant further assessment of the representativeness of the study populations, organization of perinatal services, national guidelines, philosophy of care at extreme GAs, and resources used for decision-making.
Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-11-21
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Stellan Håkansson
Tetsuya Isayama
Satoshi Kusuda
Brian Reichman
Liisa Lehtonen
Kei Lui
Mark Adams
Neena Modi
Kjell Helenius
Dirk Bassler
Prakesh S. Shah
Brian A. Darlow
Gunnar Sjörs
Naho Morisaki
Máximo Vento
Shoo K. Lee
Franca Rusconi
on behalf of the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes (iNeo) of Neonates
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%