Andragogy in Practice: Applying a Theoretical Framework to Team Science Training in Biomedical Research

Андрагогика на практике: применение теоретической модели к обучению командной науке в области биомедицинских исследований
Elizabeth J. Kopras, Jennifer Rose V. Molano, Jason T. Blackard, Jacqueline M. Knapke, Laura Hildreth, Stephanie Schuckman, Megan Johnstone, Matt Lamkin, Rebecca C. Lee, John R. Kues, Angela Mendell
2024-03-28

andragogybiomedical researchembedded study designproblem-based learningteam science training
This study is the first to apply the theoretical principles of Malcolm Knowles' theory of andragogy to evaluate data collected from learners who participated in team science training workshops in a biomedical research setting. Briefly, andragogy includes six principles: the learner's self-concept, the role of experience, readiness to learn, orientation to learning, the learner's need to know, and intrinsic motivation. Using an embedded study design, the primary focus was on qualitative data, with quantitative data complementing the qualitative findings. The deductive analysis demonstrated that approximately 85% of the qualitative data could be connected to at least one andragogical principle. Participant responses to positive evaluation questions were largely related to two principles: readiness to learn and problem-based learning orientation. Participant responses to negative questions were largely connected to two different principles: the role of experience and self-direction. Inductive analysis found an additional theme: meeting biological needs. Quantitative survey results supported the qualitative findings. The study findings demonstrate that andragogy can serve as a valuable construct to integrate into the development of effective team science training for biomedical researchers.
1
Approximately 85% of qualitative participant data corresponded to at least one of andragogy’s six principles.
2
Inductive analysis identified meeting biological needs as an additional theme, while quantitative survey results supported the qualitative findings.
3
Negative evaluations primarily reflected the role of prior experience and learner self-direction.
4
Positive evaluations primarily reflected readiness to learn and problem-based learning orientation.
5
The findings indicate that andragogy is a valuable framework for developing effective team science training for biomedical researchers.
6
This study is the first to apply Malcolm Knowles’ andragogy framework to evaluate team science training in biomedical research.

learners participating in team science training workshops in a biomedical research setting

the applicability of Knowles' andragogical principles to learners' responses and the development of effective team science training

Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-03-28
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
34
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Elizabeth J. Kopras
Jennifer Rose V. Molano
Jason T. Blackard
Jacqueline M. Knapke
Laura Hildreth
Stephanie Schuckman
Megan Johnstone
Matt Lamkin
Rebecca C. Lee
John R. Kues
Angela Mendell
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%