Frequency and Criticality of Diagnoses in Family Medicine Practices: From the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS)

Частота и критичность диагнозов в практике семейной медицины: по данным Национального исследования амбулаторной медицинской помощи (NAMCS)
Michael R. Peabody, Thomas R. O’Neill, Keith Stelter, James C. Puffer
2018-01-01

ICD-9 codesIndex of HarmNational Ambulatory Medical Care Surveyfamily medicinescope of practice
BACKGROUND: Family medicine is a specialty of breadth, providing comprehensive health care for the individual and the family that integrates the broad scope of clinical, social, and behavioral sciences. As such, the scope of practice (SOP) for family medicine is extensive; however, over time many family physicians narrow their SOP. We sought to provide a nationally representative description of the most common and the most critical diagnoses that family physicians see in their practice. METHODS: Data were extracted from the 2012 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) to select all ICD-9 codes reported by family physicians. A panel of family physicians then reviewed 1893 ICD-9 codes to place each code into an American Board of Family Medicine Family Medicine Certification Examination test plan specifications (TPS) category and provide a rating for an Index of Harm (IoH). RESULTS: An analysis of all 1893 ICD-9 codes seen by family physicians in the 2012 NAMCS found that 198 ICD-9 codes could not be assigned a TPS category, leaving 1695 ICD-9 codes in the dataset. Top 10 lists of ICD-9 codes by TPS category were created for both frequency and IoH. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a nationally representative description of the most common diagnoses that family physicians are seeing in their practice and the criticality of these diagnoses. These results provide insight into the domain of the specialty of family medicine. Medical educators may use these results to better tailor education and training to practice.
1
A family-physician panel reviewed 1,893 ICD-9 codes, assigning 1,695 codes to Family Medicine Certification Examination test-plan categories.
2
The findings describe the breadth and clinical priorities of family medicine and may help educators tailor training to actual practice needs.
3
The panel rated diagnoses using an Index of Harm to assess their clinical criticality in family medicine practice.
4
The study used nationally representative 2012 NAMCS data to characterize diagnoses encountered by family physicians.
5
Top-10 diagnosis lists were generated for each test-plan category based on both encounter frequency and Index of Harm.

Diagnoses encountered by family physicians in U.S. ambulatory family medicine practices, based on 2012 NAMCS data

The frequency and clinical criticality (Index of Harm) of these diagnoses across family medicine practice categories

Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Michael R. Peabody
Thomas R. O’Neill
Keith Stelter
James C. Puffer
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%