The Theory of Criminal Law Should Not Be Reduced to the Analysis and Criticism of Criminal Legislation

Теория уголовного права не должна сводиться к анализу и критике уголовного законодательства
Anatoly V. Naumov
2019-03-14

Russian Criminal Codecriminal law doctrinecriminal legislationjudicial practicelegal nature of court decisions
In both normative and sociological senses criminal law includes three components — criminal legislation, judicial practice, and criminal law doctrine, and the development of this branch of law is possible only in their unity. The criminal law doctrine is to a certain extent superior to the other components of the "triad" and involves the development of the branch’s principles, goals and objectives. At the same time, the improvement of criminal law is not the only goal of the theory of criminal law. It should not be limited only to criticism of the current legislation and proposals for its improvement. However, the vast majority of modern domestic criminal law publications, such as monographs, articles in legal periodicals, dissertations, are devoted to criticism of the current Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Indeed, the current criminal law is not perfect, but the "imbalance" of research into the "law-making" side significantly reduces the scope of criminal law doctrine. And there will always be demand for theoretical studies on the analysis of the subject and method, system and objectives of criminal law, its sources.Debatable, for example, still is the issue of the legal nature of the decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and, in particular, the judgments of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The explanations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court are a special kind of judicial interpretation and a fairly reliable tool for the courts to understand "the letter of the criminal law" and it’s applicability to the particular case. As for the assessment of the legal nature of the judgments of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the criminal law doctrine often fails to notice that they touch upon the methodological problems of the theory of criminal law. In relation to a number of criminal law prohibitions, judgments of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation are a source of criminal law, along with the Criminal Code. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation specified the most important principle of criminal law — the principle of legality and clarified the characteristics of criminality of socially dangerous acts prohibited by criminal law, which is directly related to the issue of criminal liability. In this sense, the Constitutional Court formulated a new and important addition to the content of the principle of legality — the certainty of criminal law rules, and, first of all, the criminal law prohibitions. Thus, the judicial authority overtook the criminal law doctrine in solving one of the most important issues for criminal proceedings.
1
Criminal law comprises legislation, judicial practice, and legal doctrine, whose unified development is necessary for advancing the field.
2
Criminal law doctrine has a higher-order role in developing the branch’s principles, goals, and objectives, rather than merely evaluating legislation.
3
Criminal-law theory should also investigate its subject, methods, system, objectives, and sources, including unresolved questions about judicial decisions.
4
Plenary Supreme Court explanations constitute a specialized form of judicial interpretation, while Constitutional Court judgments may function as criminal-law sources and raise methodological issues for the discipline.
5
The predominant focus of Russian criminal-law scholarship on criticizing the Criminal Code creates an imbalance that narrows the scope of legal doctrine.

Theory of criminal law (as an academic/legal doctrine distinct from criminal legislation and judicial practice)

the scope, functions, and methodological foundations of criminal law theory beyond the criticism and improvement of legislation, including the legal nature of judicial decisions

Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-03-14
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Anatoly V. Naumov
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%