Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Рекомендации по реабилитации и восстановлению взрослых после инсульта
Mathew J. Reeves, Catherine E. Lang, Steven C. Cramer, Janice Jennifer Eng, Joel M. Stein, Kenneth J. Ottenbacher, Ross A Arena, Carolee Joyce Winstein, Lorie Gage Richards, Barbara E. Bates, Leora Reiff Cherney, Frank DeRuyter, Beth E. Fisher, Richard L. Harvey, Marilyn J. MacKay-Lyons, Sue Pugh, William M. Stiers, Richard David Zorowitz
2016-05-05

adult stroke rehabilitationclinical practice guidelinesinterdisciplinary rehabilitation teampostacute carestroke recovery
PURPOSE: The aim of this guideline is to provide a synopsis of best clinical practices in the rehabilitative care of adults recovering from stroke. METHODS: Writing group members were nominated by the committee chair on the basis of their previous work in relevant topic areas and were approved by the American Heart Association (AHA) Stroke Council's Scientific Statement Oversight Committee and the AHA's Manuscript Oversight Committee. The panel reviewed relevant articles on adults using computerized searches of the medical literature through 2014. The evidence is organized within the context of the AHA framework and is classified according to the joint AHA/American College of Cardiology and supplementary AHA methods of classifying the level of certainty and the class and level of evidence. The document underwent extensive AHA internal and external peer review, Stroke Council Leadership review, and Scientific Statements Oversight Committee review before consideration and approval by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. RESULTS: Stroke rehabilitation requires a sustained and coordinated effort from a large team, including the patient and his or her goals, family and friends, other caregivers (eg, personal care attendants), physicians, nurses, physical and occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, recreation therapists, psychologists, nutritionists, social workers, and others. Communication and coordination among these team members are paramount in maximizing the effectiveness and efficiency of rehabilitation and underlie this entire guideline. Without communication and coordination, isolated efforts to rehabilitate the stroke survivor are unlikely to achieve their full potential. CONCLUSIONS: As systems of care evolve in response to healthcare reform efforts, postacute care and rehabilitation are often considered a costly area of care to be trimmed but without recognition of their clinical impact and ability to reduce the risk of downstream medical morbidity resulting from immobility, depression, loss of autonomy, and reduced functional independence. The provision of comprehensive rehabilitation programs with adequate resources, dose, and duration is an essential aspect of stroke care and should be a priority in these redesign efforts. (Stroke.2016;47:e98-e169. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098.).
1
Communication and coordination among rehabilitation team members are essential to maximize rehabilitation effectiveness and efficiency; isolated efforts are unlikely to reach full potential.
2
Effective stroke rehabilitation requires a sustained, coordinated multidisciplinary team that includes the survivor, whose goals should guide care, family, caregivers, and healthcare professionals.
3
Postacute care and rehabilitation should not be treated solely as costly services to reduce, because they have important clinical effects and may reduce downstream risks and costs.
4
Recommendations are organized using AHA/American College of Cardiology evidence-classification frameworks and underwent extensive internal and external peer review.
5
The guideline synthesizes best clinical practices for rehabilitative care and recovery in adults after stroke, based on literature reviewed through 2014.

adult stroke survivors undergoing rehabilitation and recovery

best clinical practices, care coordination, and rehabilitation effectiveness in post-stroke recovery

Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-05-05
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
3265
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Mathew J. Reeves
Catherine E. Lang
Steven C. Cramer
Janice Jennifer Eng
Joel M. Stein
Kenneth J. Ottenbacher
Ross A Arena
Carolee Joyce Winstein
Lorie Gage Richards
Barbara E. Bates
Leora Reiff Cherney
Frank DeRuyter
Beth E. Fisher
Richard L. Harvey
Marilyn J. MacKay-Lyons
Sue Pugh
William M. Stiers
Richard David Zorowitz
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%