Determinants of individuals’ belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news

Факторы, определяющие веру людей в фейковые новости: обзор объема исследований
Victoria Vziatysheva, Kirill Bryanov
2021-06-24

belief in fake newscomparative studiesplatform diversitystimulus formatssusceptibility to false information
BACKGROUND: Proliferation of misinformation in digital news environments can harm society in a number of ways, but its dangers are most acute when citizens believe that false news is factually accurate. A recent wave of empirical research focuses on factors that explain why people fall for the so-called fake news. In this scoping review, we summarize the results of experimental studies that test different predictors of individuals' belief in misinformation. METHODS: The review is based on a synthetic analysis of 26 scholarly articles. The authors developed and applied a search protocol to two academic databases, Scopus and Web of Science. The sample included experimental studies that test factors influencing users' ability to recognize fake news, their likelihood to trust it or intention to engage with such content. Relying on scoping review methodology, the authors then collated and summarized the available evidence. RESULTS: The study identifies three broad groups of factors contributing to individuals' belief in fake news. Firstly, message characteristics-such as belief consistency and presentation cues-can drive people's belief in misinformation. Secondly, susceptibility to fake news can be determined by individual factors including people's cognitive styles, predispositions, and differences in news and information literacy. Finally, accuracy-promoting interventions such as warnings or nudges priming individuals to think about information veracity can impact judgements about fake news credibility. Evidence suggests that inoculation-type interventions can be both scalable and effective. We note that study results could be partly driven by design choices such as selection of stimuli and outcome measurement. CONCLUSIONS: We call for expanding the scope and diversifying designs of empirical investigations of people's susceptibility to false information online. We recommend examining digital platforms beyond Facebook, using more diverse formats of stimulus material and adding a comparative angle to fake news research.
1
Adding a comparative angle to fake news research is recommended to improve understanding of determinants of belief.
2
Empirical investigations should examine digital platforms beyond Facebook to better understand belief in fake news.
3
Research on individuals' susceptibility to online false information is currently too narrow and should be expanded.
4
Studies should use more diverse formats of stimulus material rather than relying on limited content types.

Individuals' belief in fake news (people's susceptibility to false online information)

Determinants of belief in fake news, including platform effects, stimulus formats, and comparative factors influencing susceptibility to false online information

Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-06-24
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
214
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Victoria Vziatysheva
Kirill Bryanov
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%