Which Treatment Method Is Better in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Corticosteroid Injection, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, or Radiofrequency Thermal Lesioning?

Какой метод лечения лучше при хроническом подошвенном фасциите: введение кортикостероида, внеорганная ударно-волновая терапия или радиочастотная термальная лезия?
İlker Fatih Sarı, Furkan Yapıcı, Volkan Gür, Reşit Karaköse, Ismail Tardus, Hanifi Üçpunar
2023-09-01

Chronic plantar fasciitisCorticosteroid injectionExtracorporeal shock wave therapyRadiofrequency thermal lesioningVisual analog scale
BACKGROUND: Chronic plantar fasciitis (CPF) is a common disease that has various treatment options. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three of these options: corticosteroid injection (CSI), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), and radiofrequency thermal lesioning (RTL). METHODS: The records of 229 patients treated with CSI (n = 81), ESWT (n = 76), or RTL (n = 72) were retrospectively analyzed. Visual analog scale scores, patient satisfaction-related success rates, repeated treatment rates, and initial treatment change rates were compared. RESULTS: Mean ± SD follow-up was 19.0 ± 4.5 months. Baseline clinical characteristics, mean visual analog scale scores (before treatment and at months 3, 6, and 12), patient satisfaction and success rates (at months 6 and 12), and repeated treatment and initial treatment change rates were similar between treatment groups. No complications were observed after the treatments. CONCLUSIONS: All three options-CSI, ESWT, and RTL-were found to be safe and effective in treating CPF, with similar outcomes up to 1 year. Use of CSIs is advantageous because it is more accessible than the other treatments. Similarly, the noninvasive nature of ESWT is glaring among other minimally invasive options. Therefore, the first-line treatment modality of CPF can be CSI or ESWT, depending on the patient's and physician's joint preference; RTL treatment should be tried in patients who do not respond to these treatments.
1
CSI and ESWT are recommended as first-line treatments due to accessibility (CSI) and noninvasive nature (ESWT); RTL reserved for nonresponders.
2
CSI, ESWT, and RTL produced similar mean VAS pain scores before treatment and at months 3, 6, and 12 in chronic plantar fasciitis patients.
3
No complications were observed after CSI, ESWT, or RTL during mean follow-up of 19.0 ± 4.5 months.
4
Patient satisfaction-related success rates at months 6 and 12 were similar across CSI, ESWT, and RTL groups.
5
Repeated treatment rates and initial treatment change rates did not differ significantly between CSI, ESWT, and RTL.

Chronic plantar fasciitis patients treated with corticosteroid injection, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, or radiofrequency thermal lesioning

Comparative effectiveness and safety outcomes of CSI, ESWT, and RTL measured by pain (visual analog scale), patient satisfaction/success rates, repeated treatment and initial treatment change rates over up to 12 months

Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-09-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
7
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
İlker Fatih Sarı
Furkan Yapıcı
Volkan Gür
Reşit Karaköse
Ismail Tardus
Hanifi Üçpunar
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%