Biomechanics of fencing sport: A scoping review

Биомеханика фехтования: обзор скоупинга
Tony Lin‐Wei Chen, Duo Wai‐Chi Wong, Yan Wang, Sicong Ren, Fei Yan, Ming Zhang
2017-02-10

fencing biomechanicsmotion captureneuromuscular coordinationpedobarographyscoping review
OBJECTIVES: The aim of our scoping review was to identify and summarize current evidence on the biomechanics of fencing to inform athlete development and injury prevention. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHOD: Peer-reviewed research was identified from electronic databases using a structured keyword search. Details regarding experimental design, study group characteristics and measured outcomes were extracted from retrieved studies, summarized and information regrouped under themes for analysis. The methodological quality of the evidence was evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-seven peer-reviewed studies were retrieved, the majority being observational studies conducted with experienced and elite athletes. The methodological quality of the evidence was "fair" due to the limited scope of research. Male fencers were the prevalent group studied, with the lunge and use of a foil weapon being the principal movement evaluated. Motion capture and pedabarography were the most frequently used data collection techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Elite fencers exhibited sequential coordination of upper and lower limb movements with coherent patterns of muscle activation, compared to novice fencers. These elite features of neuromuscular coordination resulted in higher magnitudes of forward linear velocity of the body center of mass and weapon. Training should focus on explosive power. Sex- and equipment-specific effects could not be evaluated based on available research.
1
Available evidence was insufficient to evaluate sex-specific or equipment-specific biomechanical effects.
2
Elite fencers demonstrated more sequential upper- and lower-limb coordination and coherent muscle activation than novice fencers.
3
Elite neuromuscular coordination produced greater forward linear velocities of the body center of mass and weapon, supporting training focused on explosive power.
4
Evidence quality was rated fair because research scope was limited, with male fencers, lunges, and foil weapons most frequently studied.
5
Motion capture and pedabarography were the most commonly used techniques for measuring fencing biomechanics.
6
The scoping review identified 37 peer-reviewed biomechanics studies, predominantly observational research involving experienced or elite fencers.

Biomechanics of fencing sport, particularly the lunge performed by experienced and elite fencers using foil weapons

Movement coordination, muscle activation, and forward linear velocity of the body center of mass and weapon in fencing, including differences between elite and novice fencers

Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-02-10
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Tony Lin‐Wei Chen
Duo Wai‐Chi Wong
Yan Wang
Sicong Ren
Fei Yan
Ming Zhang
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%