Knapsack based Optimal Policies for Budget-Limited Multi-Armed Bandits
Оптимальные политики на основе задачи о рюкзаке для многоруких бандитов с ограниченным бюджетом
2012-04-09
SCID: 54.1/83x7wxnx
Discuss with AI
KUBEbudget-limited multi-armed banditsfractional KUBEknapsack-based policiesregret bounds
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
In budget-limited multi-armed bandit (MAB) problems, the learner's actions are costly and constrained by a fixed budget. Consequently, an optimal exploitation policy may not be to pull the optimal arm repeatedly, as is the case in other variants of MAB, but rather to pull the sequence of different arms that maximises the agent's total reward within the budget. This difference from existing MABs means that new approaches to maximising the total reward are required. Given this, we develop two pulling policies, namely: (i) KUBE; and (ii) fractional KUBE. Whereas the former provides better performance up to 40% in our experimental settings, the latter is computationally less expensive. We also prove logarithmic upper bounds for the regret of both policies, and show that these bounds are asymptotically optimal (i.e. they only differ from the best possible regret by a constant factor).
Key Findings
1
Both policies have logarithmic regret upper bounds, and these bounds are asymptotically optimal up to a constant factor.
2
In budget-limited multi-armed bandits, optimal exploitation may require a sequence of different arms rather than repeatedly selecting the highest-reward arm.
3
KUBE achieves up to 40% better performance than fractional KUBE in the reported experimental settings, while fractional KUBE is computationally cheaper.
4
The paper introduces two budget-aware pulling policies: KUBE and fractional KUBE.
Research Object
budget-limited multi-armed bandit problems
Research Subject
optimal arm-pulling policies for maximizing total reward under a fixed budget, including regret performance and computational cost
Publication Details
Publication Date
2012-04-09
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest