Insurance Acceptance, Appointment Wait Time, and Dermatologist Access Across Practice Types in the US

Принятие различных видов страхования, время ожидания приема и доступ к дерматологам в медицинских практиках разных типов в США
Andrew Creadore, Sheena Desai, Sara J. Li, Karen J. Lee, Ai‐Tram N. Bui, Camila Villa‐Ruiz, Kelly Lo, Guohai Zhou, Cara Joyce, Jack Resneck, Kira Seiger, Arash Mostaghimi
2021-01-14

Medicaid accessappointment wait timesdermatology accessinsurance acceptanceprivate equity ownership
Importance: In the 15 years since dermatology access was last investigated on a national scale, the practice landscape has changed with the rise of private equity (PE) investment and increased use of nonphysician clinicians (NPCs). Objective: To determine appointment success and wait times for patients with various insurance types at clinics with and without PE ownership. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this study, PE-owned US clinics were randomly selected and matched with 2 geographically proximate clinics without PE ownership. Researchers called each clinic 3 times over a 5-day period to assess appointment/clinician availability for a fictitious patient with a new and changing mole. The 3 calls differed by insurance type specified, which were Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) preferred provider organization, Medicare, or Medicaid. Main Outcomes and Measures: Appointment success and wait times among insurance types and between PE-owned clinics and control clinics. Secondary outcomes were the provision of accurate referrals to other clinics when appointments were denied and clinician and next-day appointment availability. Results: A total of 1833 calls were made to 204 PE-owned and 407 control clinics without PE ownership across 28 states. Overall appointment success rates for BCBS, Medicare, and Medicaid were 96%, 94%, and 17%, respectively. Acceptance of BCBS (98.5%; 95% CI, 96%-99%; P = .03) and Medicare (97.5%; 95% CI, 94%-99%; P = .02) were slightly higher at PE-owned clinics (compared with 94.6% [95% CI, 92%-96%] and 92.8% [95% CI, 90%-95%], respectively, at control clinics). Wait times (median days, interquartile range [IQR]) were similar for patients with BCBS (7 days; IQR, 2-22 days) and Medicare (7 days; IQR, 2-25 days; P > .99), whereas Medicaid patients waited significantly longer (13 days; IQR, 4-33 days; P = .002). Clinic ownership did not significantly affect wait times. Private equity-owned clinics were more likely than controls to offer a new patient appointment with an NPC (80% vs 63%; P = .001) and to not have an opening with a dermatologist (16% vs 6%; P < .001). Next-day appointment availability was greater at PE-owned clinics than controls (30% vs 21%; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Patients with Medicaid had significantly lower success in obtaining appointments and significantly longer wait times regardless of clinic ownership. Although the use of dermatologists and NPCs was similar regardless of clinic ownership, PE-owned clinics were more likely than controls to offer new patient appointments with NPCs.
1
Appointment success was high for BCBS (96%) and Medicare (94%) patients but substantially lower for Medicaid patients (17%).
2
Clinic ownership did not significantly affect appointment wait times, despite modestly higher commercial and Medicare insurance acceptance at PE-owned clinics.
3
Median wait times were 7 days for BCBS and Medicare patients but significantly longer for Medicaid patients at 13 days.
4
PE-owned clinics had slightly higher acceptance of BCBS (98.5%) and Medicare (97.5%) than non-PE clinics (94.6% and 92.8%, respectively).
5
The study assessed dermatologist access across 611 clinics in 28 states using 1833 calls and compared PE-owned clinics with geographically matched non-PE clinics.

US dermatology clinics, including private equity-owned and non-private-equity-owned practices

Insurance acceptance, appointment success, and wait times for patients with BCBS, Medicare, or Medicaid, including differences by private equity ownership

Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-01-14
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
111
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Andrew Creadore
Sheena Desai
Sara J. Li
Karen J. Lee
Ai‐Tram N. Bui
Camila Villa‐Ruiz
Kelly Lo
Guohai Zhou
Cara Joyce
Jack Resneck
Kira Seiger
Arash Mostaghimi
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%