Third Generation Antipsychotic Drugs: Partial Agonism or Receptor Functional Selectivity?
Антипсихотические препараты третьего поколения: частичный агонизм или функциональная селективность рецептора?
2010-01-15
SCID: 54.1/853csxez
Discuss with AI
D2 functional selectivityD2 partial agonismantipsychotic generationsaripiprazoledopamine D2 and 5-HT2A antagonism
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Functional selectivity is the term that describes drugs that cause markedly different signaling through a single receptor (e.g., full agonist at one pathway and antagonist at a second). It has been widely recognized recently that this phenomenon impacts the understanding of mechanism of action of some drugs, and has relevance to drug discovery. One of the clinical areas where this mechanism has particular importance is in the treatment of schizophrenia. Antipsychotic drugs have been grouped according to both pattern of clinical action and mechanism of action. The original antipsychotic drugs such as chlorpromazine and haloperidol have been called typical or first generation. They cause both antipsychotic actions and many side effects (extrapyramidal and endocrine) that are ascribed to their high affinity dopamine D(2) receptor antagonism. Drugs such as clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone and others were then developed that avoided the neurological side effects (atypical or second generation antipsychotics). These compounds are divided mechanistically into those that are high affinity D(2) and 5-HT(2A) antagonists, and those that also bind with modest affinity to D(2), 5-HT(2A), and many other neuroreceptors. There is one approved third generation drug, aripiprazole, whose actions have been ascribed alternately to either D(2) partial agonism or D(2) functional selectivity. Although partial agonism has been the more widely accepted mechanism, the available data are inconsistent with this mechanism. Conversely, the D(2) functional selectivity hypothesis can accommodate all current data for aripiprazole, and also impacts on discovery compounds that are not pure D(2) antagonists.
Key Findings
1
Antipsychotics historically grouped: first-generation (high-affinity D2 antagonists with antipsychotic and extrapyramidal/endocrine side effects) and second-generation (atypical, avoiding neurological side effects via varied D2/5-HT2A and other receptor profiles).
2
Aripiprazole, the approved third-generation drug, has been alternately attributed to D2 partial agonism or D2 functional selectivity.
3
Available data are inconsistent with the D2 partial agonism explanation for aripiprazole.
4
Functional selectivity describes drugs producing different signaling outcomes at a single receptor (e.g., full agonist at one pathway, antagonist at another).
5
The D2 functional selectivity hypothesis can accommodate all current data for aripiprazole and influences the interpretation and discovery of non–pure D2 antagonist compounds.
Research Object
Aripiprazole (a third-generation antipsychotic) and its interaction with dopamine D2 receptors
Research Subject
Whether aripiprazole's actions at D2 receptors are best explained by partial agonism versus receptor functional selectivity (ligand-directed signaling)
Publication Details
Publication Date
2010-01-15
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest