Reading Soldiers' Moods: Russian Military Censorship and the Configuration of Feeling in World War I

Чтение настроений солдат: российская военная цензура и конфигурация чувств в годы Первой мировой войны
William G. Rosenberg
2014-06-01

Russian military censorshipWorld War Iemotional communitieshistorical experiencehistory of emotions
William G. Rosenberg is Professor Emeritus of History at the University of Michigan, Research Associate in History at Bowdoin College, and Scholar Associate at the St. Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian Academy of Sciences. His interests have focused on late imperial and revolutionary Russia, historical theory, and archives. In 2011 he and Francis X. Blouin published Processing the Past: Contesting Authority in History and the Archives (Oxford University Press), which received the Society of American Archivists' Waldo Gifford Leland Award. Rosenberg has served as vice president of the Research Division of the AHA and president of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies (now the Association for the Study of East European and Eurasian Studies). Although the historical exploration of emotions is an expanding field of research, the analysis of how feelings may affect the course of historical events remains a vexing problem for historians. Important work has helped us understand how emotional experience may be set historically by cultural norms and social contexts, and we have come to appreciate the conceptual value of discerning emotional communities.1 There are also impressive studies on the contextualized social meanings of key emotions such as fear, the ways these meanings affect gender and gender relations, and the kinds of emotional mobilization engaged by mass politics.2 William Reddy and others have taken up the neurological dimensions of emotion as well, including a few scholars in Russia whose work is little-known abroad. Caught up themselves in the post-Soviet turmoil of emotional and social dislocation, they have sought to add “how it really felt” to traditional explorations of “how it really was.”3 Indeed, it is not too much to say that most good historians now accept that some understanding of feeling is key to deciphering how historical experience was lived and remembered.4 Yet the problem of actually accessing emotional states remains, especially at moments of social crisis, when established norms and expressions may be taxed. How can historians be sure that the feelings described in their sources reflect what was actually felt? Sensitive biographers may tease these out in ways that seem wholly convincing, but how does one discern whether or how the expression of emotion itself has filtered an individual's feelings through the social and cultural norms they also engage? For literary scholars, the issue is how literature engages or creates the reader's own feelings.5 For historians, the issue centers on access to the historical actualities of feeling itself through sources in which emotional expression may be mediated by social and cultural values quite different from their own. Is reading emotion in their sources for historians, then, also filtering and configuring feelings, constructing as well as uncovering the evidence? In what ways, in other words, does the problem of accessing emotion for historians lie in the ways it is “read”? There is also a problematic nexus here between the expression of individual emotions and what are often represented as collective feelings: those that are thought reductively to be experienced or expressed as if the collective were an organic emotional whole. Are there circumstances in which individual expressions of emotion might reasonably be read to reflect those of a larger group? Are there differences here between periods of relative social stability and moments of historical crisis? And can the ways in which historians and others configure collective feelings also be as important as the ways in which these feelings appear to be collectively expressed, such as during military parades? Even for historians alert to the problems involved, the relationships in individuals between emotional experience and how it is expressed, remembered, and acted out are problematic. They are even more so for historians when dealing with collectivities, such as soldiers at war. For the Russian High Command in July these were not In the of military during the and the of in the revolutionary of soldiers in and well the there were more between and that on the with to but a of the with which and were and the of and to if Russia was to a imperial between and in the Russian but the of of to the from the the of and were and the were collective in of individual of their In and Russia also of were with the of more of Russian soldiers read and at some of social and and expanding emotional states was now an for so was the and of the of some of on to and from the during In in to that the and of their were not in in by In and does not seem to have a in there was on the and and the of social as in as In were and in St. Petersburg the a up military in of was on July the was And in Russia were the of military and on the emotional and states of military the Russian be from the what their were feeling and the it from from the to the and as they that not the There be more to their but also to how those be in in the Russian High Command be the the emotional of Russian military was what is in Russian the of individuals and their can be as but the in Russian the between emotions and between feelings such as and or and the feelings with and the experience of is more the the Russian of which and the of emotional states from Yet to the problem of and is the between emotional states and their whether in or in In what ways, then, the military configure feelings at the during How important was their reading itself of the mass of to their understanding of individual and collective emotional How were they in their and does the that the itself between feeling and expression is not in the for July and Russia a of an the of in the of to a that to the between the of and were or of their were and some or were by as others were taken or of the Russian was in of an of a or even of more of were through the during by of the of the the the of Russian and were as as of Russian historians has to and emotions the of in also to configure states of in collective most good in the whose to was a were a of not as well as the more and served on the and at and and as well, which was read during the and was a of soldiers in Indeed, in to the emotional of and to for feelings and the individual of in of and in July of emotional the of whether the of and the between and with a of research, of and as the in ways on Slavic the of and the of the of and of a in a of collective soldiers good to the They also an of and a to for with their emotional was also a key feelings in of a to and Russia they have to the or from to their to the with to be but with a to that in the to they military and in Russia during the and of the of social a of organic and the of individual's to is by a of and a of emotion that historically also and engaged of of itself also creates what can be emotional emotional that feelings in some to kinds of or with military or and with or to in the for military then, was what to soldiers when the of war. the read in the of their was or at July and the Russian the of the a to East a key to that the be to an Yet to the at the good and feeling to the from in of the ways military the read during the few of war. military in Russia was also to the of of that soldiers and were their on and to that they received from the with the was also in of of received from or at the to the for in and with the as the were to with but well the of even to and even for the the of the in how the military were military was or on with much of the the was by a for to up on the especially in the of the to or from and soldiers states of or feelings were and by They were a in the of what to they were by what be out and on to the whose it was to the on a were up the of with from the with the for Russian soldiers on the during during the of the when military were of the was a of and but with a of And even as Russian experienced the in and their were as In on the read and a of the to to and in some of the were with the to the not how the High Command these but such for the Russia of the important at In one of the most in the of the was the of the and the for a in the the the the with and were and more or to a of even if in the the for or also to by different one to the of these were as in a and of the to to and for a to the other of of at and that was not to be and some were also in these ways in and as military in was in and In Russia, also to their of or the of of how a was emotional field and of even the most the war. of the at the to be with some of the good and feeling even the a in the of has not the when were in their during the and of of the soldiers be by the of their or their during of the for is that the is and as those these for in for the to and with is for the of that of the were In the to and and of the was during when the soldiers not their to the that lie but to and on for the to the is soldiers not not accept In of their and they are one They not to their to one from the in July the was so with such a such a in the we the to a to a of the and one in the the even the and at the for In with social in and the itself those from the that the the of that were be a the in Even the in when that of was for the for the and especially for the of the some that of the remains and at a and were even with their their and to read feelings through In they were now to be as as they on the of military and In late a of the that and be and but that was how the were of were now to that revolutionary were of the and in some or In some soldiers that it was to others that they were their own expressed an to are to but we the of the in he was by the and good that he thought the to with the of the at the by on the what a late as the of the and their was of the of the and important for the High it be in the in In the some military in the read more of to as late as Even as the the that and feelings be read was set in Russian the of the a for and military it a conceptual for the of of the the the of the of the and their was so important to good and feeling the of the the the read by one in for expressed the their and the expressed the Even when the of were they were with much of those that were were was not or have collective on their but as with the of military for the the that their whose the with and other from and the including some with in the with these the read from the as feelings of as well as a of at the of of as well as a to even if these feelings were not from one for was up the of in the of with a mass of which he not that for actually for of us such and circumstances often and and to was to and such as some how they were the in the of taken and not but that from the and not to military For one reading such which the that the of they represented a for the of and was that so actually expressed these especially in the mobilization that and military of for and when the were at but especially to the and the during the to the of the the by the he especially in the the he and that was at the of with the High that be and were in a of emotional and and were of how Russian soldiers were now to of how they in or the that the in the and and an emotional field of and and the High with not In other words, of what they thought they be what soldiers and their thought were they be and which may actually have In William with the of the Russian in a engaged in as well as one to what they may well have expressed some of the feelings, the of the emotions they engaged here in a field of cultural values and emotional in and different and when they were their and for High was even an that served to the expression of feeling and experience as well, at to some so and military in the of the High Command to have taken to that they in a how they their They that in were what their say if they their to that it was to the to expression and emotional the of as a or their For their may have in ways that and their good in to their own and for as the up the of also that the of the of the and their a on military the one say the of the that on the one it is as it has even the other soldiers say that there is a to that and an with from the with and the of so that the of as some to their a by the as if the more might have that the may actually have the by In for the of the and the to there were so that soldiers were good and feeling were that the own were their was of their there was for from the of the there was not one at which the from the not the of and of was of the of soldiers not to on the as in the the but the a was in the of in the of the on the a that were that the was by of and that and were from their and by and was that a have from the in which were of a to the of the High Command in the of was that were and that were reading that was late as the of were to in their of their or were in an set of through which and feelings were the of which they be the of the of were by a or more kinds of and were from the of the and the of and and the of such as and the may well have by military some to from that expressed the of that is and when how are a that so the of that it was a or were also as expressions of a of the of experienced during the were in of how and as and for the few were say that the not as much in the for as we in a also at the and including a of are with it and the as we the are not of the Russian but even what they such as were in the war. of from the of military and and have a if lie in and and of by was that the to a Russian it to the of that is that in their some now that it was in these circumstances to on a collective was to a collective of that to a of were as that was that soldiers and collectively good and feeling their and have the during these of and have to the even to there is one the for that at and is the of such even as the and the more and soldiers were when the their their and from to be one might is the does not Even on what was as be read as of some were read as for others were as of a to the are For the of for was as the the of of the some were especially in filtering their the were in and other were as by soldiers the for the the problems of reading there is much in the of through that and from the and to the of and the of and the and of the in and of field the of not of and and others were their the at and that through the have of in Russian historians and are especially good at even as their on collective that of such as and the historical of also that they their were that the of in the their for and that feelings an in military to good and feeling from a of one can also some of how the expression of feelings as the In for a in the here is we here a the to that the of was an that of the may well have to that such in their in to the of their In what soldiers their for a to be and their the of they are that be and to such as these were also to of as a the was not is we well what are be for if we to And there was that soldiers were with one as one expressed it the late of and with of has come to to read as a to the to and is to how might have in to are some in the war. There is of fear, for or that they were for by few to much with a military and there is that was or that it on the Russian as as it was not acted out in have these may well have these feelings they their was an of what has and which has in of accessing what may be through of also read for as a but there is that even the most experienced some of at the as soldiers of were the to in a of was and to soldiers actually their their were especially it to to the of which from in the of and is and the is and there is the of they were us to the with that be and how they the that is what the one has these seem to us to the And how Russian military have in reading more to an collective during the by historians with their is the of whether the between emotional experience and expression can be the between the of feeling and in or In the problem for historians that of the Russian military to is that and were collective feelings: what most important the in Russia was the of an as a so that be and the of individual those they was of the by military to emotions and a and in the circumstances of the it also of that were in Russian and the of and even abroad. the of were in the of of the military in a of and in Russia, that in even more as we and to the were also different in important so was not their or their in a but the that collective be and at some through to collective organic of social that not in the of social a literature their individual may and feelings in ways a social they not actually they kinds of social and and may soldiers even if those feelings are mediated by different emotional In the and and may well at for a social of feeling here may well be for a collective to be expressed by the Yet Russian military were at some from the soldiers and they their with those they and in own experience engaged and a of were to what soldiers of was the through which they read individual feelings, collective and their issue by their of the of and is whether collective experience in the of in be in or even at from the with which their is that on how the engaged their own and here the in on soldiers what they thought were they also read what they thought were they by the and of individual and has in the has a of military mobilization in In and the in Russia, soldiers and were to the one that and the of and to their for and to their with to as one to of the in the of of the he have on in was to a in Yet more read the the they of and they as the a emotional of feelings, of which what and reasonably that at the of were read as at the for even if were not and were to that the to especially for soldiers from their for the in the of for a of the on the of the they for their soldiers to in the of and that of military during the even as the in and the on the with collective feelings with the emotional states these were to on the for good on of an the and the the more he was to In some itself and ways of in some of an and or were as and most important in of the course of the for in some a of that the that soldiers that on Even in and when some the to for and to on the and in when soldiers by were that of were were that the the is here their own of feeling to those in the own is for when he the on in In an emotional field for to of what they more to the in of military what they to even the that Russian to and read even in expressions such as to In the of individual the how the may have the of and the to which and cultural of to kinds of or was also an of the Yet collective that at even a of a reading the of a collective emotional a in other words, of an can be for much of the soldiers in ways that that they were to their own to in they in with or what as of expressed by some soldiers themselves that be from the of the soldiers of and their or feelings to or the and in accessing individual the one is and the is and there is the of seem to emotional much they are filtered through William Reddy has an to in on the to expressions that not an emotional but an emotional he that the expression itself in individual the feelings it that they were or that they were good or to the may have soldiers that even here and with more the of expression itself as a of experience we a literature has how lived experience as are and how these individual and social in of and literature has that social also Yet the of that in the of was in and in and of the experience at the in was How it be and described was as well as in the of an or even may actually the of expression to the of For especially those were and to to others how they the of or during the on and in and as well as in military may have a to with a of expression and of seem especially important in they and soldiers the at their in the was and has even the and the of the were quite Even if they were and from the military of they as They or as was the of the for the most that between the soldiers and of an at the to to Yet there is that were in some Russian soldiers from the of Although there were few the in July and to by the of some of but or in the even described to the of their that the of a the was not with in the and and to the as if they the of and good also expression in a different of at the when the when the have and there are of in were also sure to at some the of in even if they were not or out in the feelings of fear, and emotional that Even in the of the some soldiers to these as their the of from which there was to the of from the the of and one can the by that the themselves also the emotions they in to the the soldiers in the also their emotional expressions by a of Although the problem of accessing feelings through their expression remains, the of that of can to the emotions they are read as For military and historians the problem of access itself much an to emotional Even as some soldiers their emotional in here too was of a problem in the of feeling to expression the during In the of Russian soldiers experienced their in as the has was the in the of and of the on the Russian an in to their so by their that they were to us is the of the that a of the in and to the and social of which so much has emotional events to the are by their the of emotional have are often to the feelings they can to these in Even historians the to which individual experience is as a of understand how it may experience as the of as if were in individual of what experience and are now as mediated by the and that and has expressed historical experience not the and that we have experienced the as in the experienced it is the experience of a a between what we are now and what others were can be expressed through cultural or but they can be the most of an experience to or in the even the of soldiers at can also actually be in mediated and can be for the feelings and that Russian historians to from the important these might have to how that was of military during that the of historians to how experience may be expressed be by an exploration of how it may be There to be a in between and of such as war. Although the even that historians might reasonably collective feelings in seem to expression at at at or in There may also be but if their expression social they the in reading feelings and the problems that such as even during military or at military is to or even reflect the or emotions that the itself is a the their reading is more may also be by cultural values and emotional norms that or their as we might was the with and the In and reading emotions and their may be to Russia in is the of and cultural that Russian to their how they read their of can us of how they as the states they were with kinds of and even if the themselves not And filtering in of a of it also the of how soldiers actually that were to the of and which in were of those of the of not to they the more and the how soldiers may have that were historically in their the of Russian emotional norms and the circumstances of the the military here are For historians of Russia, they us not the ways a to feeling and on the of but the in of a key in the of they the and the of understanding the historical that emotions may have in other and For historians the in configuring feelings from the ways in which they are expressed in they also how these are by the ways in which feelings are to for and in of as well as to and the engaged in the is for their have on and for much appreciate their as well as the and by and especially with the in of
1
It addresses the methodological problem of accessing historical emotions through censored wartime writings and archival records.
2
It argues that analyzing feeling is essential for understanding how wartime experience was lived and remembered.
3
The abstract identifies the difficulty of determining how emotions influenced the course of historical events.
4
The paper examines how Russian military censorship during World War I shaped and configured soldiers’ feelings.
5
The study situates soldiers’ emotional experiences within cultural norms, social contexts, and institutional censorship practices.

Russian soldiers' letters and military censorship during World War I

The configuration, expression, and historical interpretation of soldiers' feelings under wartime censorship

Publication Details
Publication Date
2014-06-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
William G. Rosenberg
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%