Chapter 6 Slavery and Empire

Глава 6. Рабство и империя
Christoph Witzenrath
2022-11-07

MuscovyTatar warriorsempire-buildingransoming captivityslavery and liberation
The preceding chapters showed representations of slavery and liberation in political culture, and the ways in which Muscovites interacted with them. During the middle Muscovite period, such representations increasingly shaped the worldview of wider sections of the population. The Orthodox religious imagery inherent in these ideas of liberation might indicate that their scope was limited to Orthodoxy, in which the Christian flock closed in on itself, closed ranks against dangerous external slavers, excluded nomads and Muslims. However, this was not what happened. Muscovy employed large numbers of mounted Tatar warriors in its armies, and the conquest of Kazan would not have been feasible without the active participation of Tatar princes of the first rank, and many Tatar warriors serving the Muscovite tsar. 1 Muscovy depended heavily on Tatar military and leadership during some of its wars. 2 Some Tatars achieved high status, and many were able to redeem themselves through service and retained some of their status over several generations during the century after the conquest. Although they lost some land to monasteries and Russian landowners in the middle Volga region, and often found themselves moved to the new Arzamas steppe fortress line in the south, most towns remained predominantly Tatar, or Chuvash, or Mari or, in any case, non-Russian in ethnic terms. 3 Moreover, the very activities associated with ransoming demanded the involvement of Tatars. They communicated throughout inner Eurasia in their own language in a context foreign to Orthodox Muscovites, in order to find captives and slaves and negotiate with their masters. This chapter will, on the one hand, trace this socio-cultural context of ransoming and liberation from captivity, and on the other, investigate the symbolical means of communicating across cultural and religious boundaries for the sake of ransoming and empire-building. The question is whether and by what means such practices and ideologies contributed to the power of Muscovy's rulers.
1
After the conquest, many Middle Volga towns remained predominantly Tatar, Chuvash, or Mari despite land transfers and population relocations.
2
Despite Orthodox liberation imagery, Muscovy integrated large numbers of Tatar warriors and depended on Tatar princes and soldiers for the conquest of Kazan.
3
Muscovy’s political culture increasingly shaped broader population views of slavery and liberation during the middle Muscovite period.
4
Ransom and liberation practices required Tatars to communicate across Inner Eurasia and across cultural and religious boundaries, supporting both captive recovery and imperial expansion.
5
Tatar military service enabled some individuals to attain high status, redeem themselves, and preserve elements of status across several generations.

Muscovite ransoming and liberation-from-captivity practices within the multiethnic Muscovite Empire, including Tatar participation

The sociocultural context and symbolic means of cross-cultural and cross-religious communication that enabled ransoming, liberation from captivity, and empire-building

Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-11-07
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
0
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Christoph Witzenrath
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%