Enhancing teacher AI literacy and integration through different types of cases in teacher professional development
Повышение ИИ-грамотности учителей и интеграции ИИ через различные типы кейсов в профессиональном развитии учителей
2024-04-10
SCID: 54.1/88v25d4f
Discuss with AI
AI literacycase-based AI professional developmentdirect instructionill-structured problemsteacher AI integration
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into teaching practices is increasingly vital for preparing students for a technology-centric future. This study examined the influence of a case-based AI professional development (PD) program on AI integration strategies and AI literacy among seven middle school science teachers. Employing three distinct case problems, from well-structured to ill-structured, the AI PD program aimed to stimulate teachers’ reflection on AI literacy development and encourage the construction of problem-solving and AI integration strategies within various pedagogical contexts. Analysis of video-recorded case discussions revealed that teachers primarily drew on personal experiences for collaborative problem-solving across the three cases. However, the complexity of the case problems influenced their approach to knowledge co-construction, and dealing with ill-structured problems promoted the application of new knowledge. Through analyzing the survey data, we found a marked increase in teachers’ AI literacy, particularly in the domain of knowing and understanding AI, suggesting a pivotal role for direct instruction that supports AI literacy growth. However, their application of this AI knowledge was limited during the case discussions, while other domains of teacher AI literacy were more frequently employed. The findings highlight the importance of combining direct instruction with case-based discussions in AI-related PD programs to bolster teacher AI literacy effectively. The research has implications for using a case-based learning approach during short-term PD initiatives and advocates the ongoing need for comprehensive AI literacy development to facilitate teachers’ AI integration in subject-specific teaching.
Key Findings
1
A case-based AI professional development (PD) program with three case types (well-structured to ill-structured) was used with seven middle school science teachers to stimulate AI integration strategies.
2
Case complexity affected knowledge co-construction: more complex, ill-structured problems promoted application of new knowledge.
3
Combining direct instruction with case-based discussions is important for effectively bolstering teacher AI literacy in short-term PD programs.
4
Survey data showed a marked increase in teachers' AI literacy, especially in the 'knowing and understanding AI' domain, indicating the effectiveness of direct instruction.
5
Teachers primarily relied on personal experiences for collaborative problem-solving across all three case types.
6
Teachers’ application of newly acquired AI knowledge during case discussions was limited, while other AI literacy domains were used more frequently.
Research Object
Case-based AI professional development program for middle school science teachers
Research Subject
Effects on teachers' AI integration strategies and AI literacy (especially knowing and understanding AI) as influenced by different case problem types (well-structured to ill-structured) during PD
Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-04-10
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
209
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai5
Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review2021
Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field2023
Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education2022
Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-In-The-Loop model2022
Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions2006