Liver Transplantation Versus ALPPS for Colorectal Liver Metastases
Трансплантация печени по сравнению с ALPPS при колоректальных метастазах в печени
2025-08-08
SCID: 54.1/8crqc3rr
Discuss with AI
ALPPSColorectal liver metastasesEntropy balancingLiver transplantationOverall survival (OS)
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
OBJECTIVE: The primary endpoint of this study was to compare liver transplantation (LT) with Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). BACKGROUND: ALPPS is usually performed for borderline CRLM cases and published oncological outcomes appear to be inferior to those obtained after LT. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing ALPPS for CRLM across 14 centers between September 2012 and September 2022 were considered. The selected ALPPS patients were compared with patients receiving LT from November 2006 to June 2019 performed at a single institution. Entropy balancing was applied to eliminate all confounding bias simulating what would have happened if ALPPS patients had been transplanted. RESULTS: During the study period, 121 consecutive patients were submitted to ALPPS and 46 were enrolled by fulfilling the inclusion criteria. These 46 cases were compared with 54 patients submitted to LT. Median OS after ALPPS was 76 months (95% CI: 28.9-123) compared with 72.7 months in patients who underwent LT (95% CI: 43.4-102 months). After reweighting, the risk of death related to ALPPS was higher when compared with LT (HR=1.40, 95% CI: 0.63-3.09) but no significant differences were found between the 2 groups ( P =0.398). When splitting the ALPPS cohort into completed and failed procedures, the median OS in failed ALPPS (31.1 months, 95% CI: 0-73.3 months) was significantly lower than that of patients submitted to LT ( P =0.043). When ALPPS patients were further selected based on SECA-II criteria, the median OS was significantly ( P =0.022) higher in the LT group (not reached) compared with ALPPS (76 months, 95% CI: 21-130 months). CONCLUSIONS: LT without current stringent selection criteria did not provide a significant survival benefit compared with ALPPS. The final choice between these 2 strategies seems to depend on the possibility of completing stage 2 and whether the patient meets the most updated transplant criteria.
Key Findings
1
After entropy balancing, ALPPS carried a higher risk of death compared with LT (HR=1.40, 95% CI: 0.63–3.09) but this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.398).
2
Median overall survival (OS) after ALPPS was 76 months (95% CI: 28.9–123) versus 72.7 months (95% CI: 43.4–102) after liver transplantation (LT).
3
Overall, LT without stringent selection criteria did not provide a significant survival benefit over ALPPS; completion of stage 2 and meeting transplant criteria are key determinants for choosing between strategies.
4
Patients with failed ALPPS procedures had significantly lower median OS (31.1 months, 95% CI: 0–73.3) than patients who underwent LT (P=0.043).
5
When restricting ALPPS patients to SECA-II transplant criteria, LT yielded significantly higher median OS (not reached) compared with ALPPS (76 months, 95% CI: 21–130; P=0.022).
Research Object
Treatment strategies for colorectal liver metastases: liver transplantation (LT) versus Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS)
Research Subject
Comparative overall survival and procedure-related mortality outcomes (including completed vs failed ALPPS and selection by SECA-II criteria) between LT and ALPPS in patients with colorectal liver metastases
Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-08-08
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
3
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest