A circular management model for sustainable and resilient geotechnical infrastructure

Циркулярная модель управления для устойчивой и жизнеспособной геотехнической инфраструктуры
Kaveh Dehghanian
2026-03-30

circular geotechnical methodscircular management modelfinite element analysislife cycle assessmentrecycled concrete aggregate
The Circular Management Model (CMM) is a reconstructive conceptual framework for integrating sustainability, resource efficiency, and resilience into the practice of geotechnical engineering. It is a new CMM approach for the geotechnical field, demonstrated through several practical case studies, numerical simulations, environmental impact assessment (EIA), and stochastic risk analysis. The research aims to provide solutions to make the construction sector more environmentally sustainable without compromising technical performance. Samples from Singapore, the Netherlands, and California were studied to examine the practical application of circular geotechnical methods, including the recycling of excavated soil, the use of RAP, and the use of Recycled Concrete Aggregate (RCA). FEA simulations of the mechanical behavior of RCA under static and seismic conditions showed an 8% increase in settlement and a 12% increase in stress compared to traditional materials; however, it remains within Eurocode 7 safety limits. Monte Carlo simulations with 10,000 repetitions decided that there is a 4.7% chance that the settlement failure will happen if RCA is used, with Young’s modulus being a leading factor (75% variance contribution). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) findings indicate that RCA use can lead to a 32% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions, a 28% decrease in energy consumption, and a 28% decrease in water consumption compared to traditional concrete. An optimization model set a 70% RCA mix as the best option for minimizing environmental impact. The results support the application of CMM in green infrastructure projects, offering a validated, multidimensional methodology that aligns with circular-economy principles, geotechnical engineering, and the UN SDGs 9, 11, and 12.
1
Case studies from Singapore, the Netherlands, and California demonstrate circular practices involving excavated-soil recycling, reclaimed asphalt pavement, and recycled concrete aggregate.
2
Finite-element simulations found that recycled concrete aggregate increased settlement by 8% and stress by 12% versus traditional materials, while remaining within Eurocode 7 safety limits.
3
Life-cycle assessment found recycled concrete aggregate reduced carbon dioxide emissions by 32%, energy consumption by 28%, and water consumption by 28%; optimization identified a 70% RCA mixture as best for minimizing environmental impact.
4
Monte Carlo analysis estimated a 4.7% probability of settlement failure with recycled concrete aggregate; Young’s modulus contributed 75% of variance.
5
The Circular Management Model integrates sustainability, resource efficiency, and resilience into geotechnical engineering through case studies, simulations, impact assessment, and risk analysis.

circular geotechnical infrastructure materials and construction practices, including recycled excavated soil, RAP, and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA)

their mechanical performance, environmental impacts, resource efficiency, resilience, and failure risk within a circular management framework

Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-03-30
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
1
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Kaveh Dehghanian
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%