Agentic AI and Large Language Models in Radiology: Opportunities and Hallucination Challenges

Агентный искусственный интеллект и большие языковые модели в радиологии: возможности и проблемы галлюцинаций
Sara Salehi, Yashbir Singh, Kelly K. Horst, Quincy A. Hathaway, Bradley J. Erickson
2025-11-26

Agentic AIhallucination mitigationlarge language modelsmulti-agent systemsretrieval-augmented generation
The field of radiology is experiencing rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs), yet their tendency to generate hallucinations (plausible but incorrect information) remains a significant barrier to trust. This comprehensive review evaluates emerging agentic artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, including multi-agent role-based systems, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and uncertainty quantification, to assess their potential for reducing hallucinations in radiology workflows. Evidence from 2024 to 2025 demonstrates that agentic AI can improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce error rates, though these methods remain computationally demanding and lack comprehensive clinical validation. Multi-agent frameworks enable cross-validation through role-based specialization and systematic workflow orchestration, while RAG strategies enhance accuracy by grounding responses in verified medical literature. Within multi-agent systems, uncertainty quantification enables agents to communicate confidence levels to one another, allowing them to appropriately weigh each other's contributions during collaborative analysis. While multi-agent frameworks and RAG strategies show significant promise, practical deployment will require careful integration with human oversight, robust evaluation metrics tailored to medical imaging tasks, and regulatory adaptation to ensure safe clinical use in diverse patient populations and imaging modalities.
1
Agentic AI approaches, including multi-agent systems, retrieval-augmented generation, and uncertainty quantification, are being evaluated to reduce hallucinations in radiology LLM workflows.
2
Clinical deployment requires human oversight, medical-imaging-specific evaluation metrics, comprehensive validation, and regulatory adaptation across diverse populations and imaging modalities.
3
Evidence from 2024–2025 indicates that agentic AI can improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce error rates, although computational demands remain substantial.
4
Retrieval-augmented generation improves response accuracy by grounding LLM outputs in verified medical literature.
5
Role-based multi-agent frameworks support cross-validation and systematic workflow orchestration by assigning specialized responsibilities to different agents.
6
Uncertainty quantification allows agents to communicate confidence levels and appropriately weight one another’s contributions during collaborative analysis.

Agentic artificial intelligence and large language models in radiology workflows

Hallucination reduction, diagnostic accuracy, error rates, uncertainty communication, and clinical deployment requirements

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-11-26
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
26
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Sara Salehi
Yashbir Singh
Kelly K. Horst
Quincy A. Hathaway
Bradley J. Erickson
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%