Predicative possession in the Novgorod Birch Bark documents in the Ural-Altaic context
Предикативная посессивность в новгородских берестяных грамотах в урало-алтайском контексте
2019-05-02
SCID: 54.1/8jqn82ru
Discuss with AI
Novgorod Birch Bark documentsUralic and Turkic languagesareal typologylocational possessivepredicative possession
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
This paper discusses predicative possessive constructions in the East Slavic languages, with a particular focus on the Old Novgorod Slavic dialect, in connection to the neighbouring Ural-Altaic languages. An areal-typological investigation shows that the East Slavic languages prefer the use of a locational possessive (mihi est), while the rest of Slavic and Europe’s Indo-European languages primarily use a have-possessive (habeo). Serving as primary data for this study, the dialect written in the Novgorod Birch Bark documents confirms a preference of the locational possessive over the have -possessive. The current study also evaluates three hypotheses on the origin of the East Slavic locational possessive, proposed in earlier studies: 1) a Uralic substrate, 2) a Slavic archaism and 3) a Northern Eurasian areal pattern. Given the typological survey as well as the empirical and historical comparative investigation, the locational possessive can be considered a preferred areal pattern across Northern Eurasia. Being a part of the macro contact zone of Northern Eurasia, the choice of locational possessive in the East Slavic languages is reinforced by the areal diffusion, especially from the close neighbouring languages, Uralic and Turkic.
Key Findings
1
Areal diffusion from neighboring Uralic and Turkic languages likely reinforced the use of locational possession in East Slavic.
2
Compared with most other Slavic and European Indo-European languages, East Slavic shows a distinctive preference for locational possessive constructions.
3
East Slavic languages, including Old Novgorod Slavic, preferentially express predicative possession through locational constructions (mihi est) rather than have-possessives (habeo).
4
Novgorod Birch Bark documents empirically confirm the dominance of locational possession in the Old Novgorod Slavic dialect.
5
The study rejects a single-origin explanation and argues that East Slavic locational possession reflects a preferred Northern Eurasian areal pattern.
6
key_findings_ru не является отдельным ключевым выводом
Research Object
predicative possessive constructions in East Slavic languages, especially the Old Novgorod Slavic dialect documented in the Novgorod Birch Bark documents, in comparison with neighbouring Uralic and Turkic languages
Research Subject
the distribution, preference, and areal-historical origins of locational versus have-possessive constructions, particularly the role of Northern Eurasian areal diffusion
Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-05-02
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest