Representational similarity analysis – connecting the branches of systems neuroscience
Анализ сходства представлений — объединение направлений системной нейронауки
2008-01-01
SCID: 54.1/8m9gmey9
Discuss with AI
functional magnetic resonance imagingmultidimensional scalingrepresentational dissimilarity matricesrepresentational similarity analysissystems neuroscience
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
A FUNDAMENTAL CHALLENGE FOR SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE IS TO QUANTITATIVELY RELATE ITS THREE MAJOR BRANCHES OF RESEARCH: brain-activity measurement, behavioral measurement, and computational modeling. Using measured brain-activity patterns to evaluate computational network models is complicated by the need to define the correspondency between the units of the model and the channels of the brain-activity data, e.g., single-cell recordings or voxels from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Similar correspondency problems complicate relating activity patterns between different modalities of brain-activity measurement (e.g., fMRI and invasive or scalp electrophysiology), and between subjects and species. In order to bridge these divides, we suggest abstracting from the activity patterns themselves and computing representational dissimilarity matrices (RDMs), which characterize the information carried by a given representation in a brain or model. Building on a rich psychological and mathematical literature on similarity analysis, we propose a new experimental and data-analytical framework called representational similarity analysis (RSA), in which multi-channel measures of neural activity are quantitatively related to each other and to computational theory and behavior by comparing RDMs. We demonstrate RSA by relating representations of visual objects as measured with fMRI in early visual cortex and the fusiform face area to computational models spanning a wide range of complexities. The RDMs are simultaneously related via second-level application of multidimensional scaling and tested using randomization and bootstrap techniques. We discuss the broad potential of RSA, including novel approaches to experimental design, and argue that these ideas, which have deep roots in psychology and neuroscience, will allow the integrated quantitative analysis of data from all three branches, thus contributing to a more unified systems neuroscience.
Key Findings
1
RSA combines second-level multidimensional scaling with randomization and bootstrap tests to relate and statistically evaluate representational structures.
2
RSA enables quantitative comparisons across brain-activity modalities, subjects, species, and computational models despite differing measurement spaces.
3
Representational dissimilarity matrices characterize information carried by neural or model representations while avoiding one-to-one correspondence between model units and brain-measurement channels.
4
The framework is demonstrated by comparing fMRI representations of visual objects in early visual cortex and fusiform face area with computational models of varying complexity.
5
The paper introduces representational similarity analysis (RSA), a framework connecting brain activity, behavior, and computational models through representational dissimilarity matrices.
Research Object
Representational similarity analysis (RSA) framework relating representational dissimilarity matrices (RDMs) derived from multi-channel neural activity, behavior, and computational models
Research Subject
Quantitative correspondence and representational similarity across brain-activity measurements, computational models, and behavior using representational dissimilarity matrices
Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai3
Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single‐subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self‐organizing group independent component analysis2006
Biophysics of Computation1998
Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V11996
Cited by3
A statistical framework for neuroimaging data analysis based on mutual information estimated via a gaussian copula2016
Deep Neural Networks as a Computational Model for Human Shape Sensitivity2016
Dissociations and Associations between Shape and Category Representations in the Two Visual Pathways2016