Comparison of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair for Primary Mitral Regurgitation Outcomes to Hospital Volumes of Surgical Mitral Valve Repair

Сравнение исходов транскатетерной крае-к-краю пластики митрального клапана при первичной митральной регургитации с объемом хирургической пластики митрального клапана в стационаре
Paul Grayburn, Michael J. Mack, Pratik Manandhar, Andrzej S. Kosinski, Anna Sannino, Robert L. Smith, Molly Szerlip, Sreekanth Vemulapalli
2024-03-04

TEER outcomesheart failure readmissionmitral valve repair volumeprimary mitral regurgitationtranscatheter edge-to-edge repair
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve (MV) repair (TEER) is an effective treatment for patients with primary mitral regurgitation at prohibitive risk for surgical MV repair (MVr). High-volume MVr centers and high-volume TEER centers have better outcomes than low-volume centers, respectively. However, whether MVr volume predicts TEER outcomes remains unknown. We hypothesized that high-volume MV surgical centers would have superior risk-adjusted outcomes for TEER than low-volume centers. METHODS: We combined data from the American College of Cardiology/Society of Thoracic Surgeons Transcatheter Valve Therapy registry and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database. MVr was defined as leaflet resection or artificial chords with or without annuloplasty and was evaluated as a continuous variable and as predefined categories (<25, 25–49, and ≥50 MV repairs/year). A generalized linear mixed model was used to evaluate risk-adjusted in-hospital/30-day mortality, 30-day heart failure readmission, and TEER success (mitral regurgitation ≤2+ and gradient <5 mm Hg). RESULTS: The study comprised 41 834 patients from 500 sites of which 332 (66.4%) were low, 102 (20.4%) intermediate, and 66 (13.2%) high-volume surgical centers ( P <0.001). TEER success was 54.6% and was not statistically significantly different across MV surgical site volumes ( P =0.4271). TEER mortality at 30 days was 3.5% with no significant difference across MVr volume on unadjusted ( P =0.141) or adjusted ( P =0.071) analysis of volume as a continuous variable. One-year mortality was 15.0% and was lower for higher MVr volume centers when adjusted for clinical and demographic variables ( P =0.027). Heart failure readmission at 1 year was 9.4% and was statistically significantly lower in high-volume centers on both unadjusted ( P =0.017) or adjusted ( P =0.015) analysis. CONCLUSIONS: TEER can be safely performed in centers with low volumes of MV repair. However, 1-year mortality and heart failure readmission are superior at centers with higher MVr volume.
1
Higher surgical mitral repair volume was associated with lower adjusted one-year mortality and significantly fewer one-year heart failure readmissions.
2
TEER can be performed safely at centers with low volumes of surgical mitral valve repair, although higher-volume centers may provide better one-year outcomes.
3
TEER success was 54.6% and did not differ significantly among low-, intermediate-, and high-volume surgical mitral repair centers.
4
The study analyzed 41,834 TEER patients across 500 centers categorized by annual surgical mitral valve repair volume.
5
Thirty-day TEER mortality was 3.5%, with no statistically significant association with surgical mitral repair volume in unadjusted or adjusted analyses.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for primary mitral regurgitation performed at centers with different annual volumes of surgical mitral valve repair

Risk-adjusted TEER success, mortality, and heart-failure readmission in relation to the volume of surgical mitral valve repair

Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-03-04
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
16
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Paul Grayburn
Michael J. Mack
Pratik Manandhar
Andrzej S. Kosinski
Anna Sannino
Robert L. Smith
Molly Szerlip
Sreekanth Vemulapalli
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%