Renegotiating acquired rights in the oil and gas industries: Industry and political cycles meet the rule of law
Пересмотр приобретённых прав в нефтегазовой промышленности: отраслевые и политические циклы в контексте верховенства права
2008-05-01
SCID: 54.1/8t5z6gmq
Discuss with AI
acquired rightscontract renegotiationoil and gas industriesresource nationalismrule of law
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
As we experience a so far sustained upwards trend in the price of petroleum and minerals,1 governments of producing countries worldwide are engaged in a fundamental revision of the terms under which international investors originally carried out their investment.2 Changes are most extensive in the cases where contracts with host states (or their state enterprises) were negotiated in times of relatively low oil, gas and mineral prices (in particular between 1985 and 1999); in the cases where a fundamental re-orientation of a host state’s policy towards foreign and private investment has taken place (eg in countries where governments now pursue a policy of anti-Western (in particular anti-USA) resource nationalism); and in the cases where new governments have reversed visibly and significantly the policies of privatization of state-owned operated upstream oil and gas and mining assets carried out in the 1990s. The renegotiation demands are more acute where the original contracts did not provide for a balanced internal adaptation system providing, now, a politically acceptable outcome for the host state. Even an internal adjustment system which responds to changes in profitability and mineral rent (eg with rate-of-return-based financial regimes) may not be able to fully accommodate host state revision demands if its structure reflects unequal bargaining power at the time of negotiation. Contracts concluded with quite inexperienced governments, for example newly independent petroleum states that emerged after the collapse of the Soviet Union have come under pressure, in particular if the explosion in oil prices has not led to a corresponding (and politically visible) increase in government income.3 This is particularly so if production in the early years has not been producing substantial government income; in such cases, it looks as if the resource is extracted and given away for free.4 This is politically not acceptable and least in an unexpected high-price environment. The current high point in the resource price cycle facilitates and enables policies of resource nationalism and re-orientation from private ownership to state control which were largely at bay during the low points of the price cycle (mainly from the late 1980s to approximately 2000). Resource nationalism has raised its head again. Political demands, often dressed in legal concepts, that were last heard of in the ‘NIEO’ (New International Economic Order) period of the 1970s,5 are now again the common currency of resource nationalism. These include arguments that contracts are only valid rebus sic stantibus (ie as long as circumstances remain the same), that governments have a unilateral ‘sovereign’ right to revoke or substantially modify contractual terms and that the rights of investors acquired since the 1980s under the international investment protection treaties are now subject to the overriding jurisdiction of national courts.6 In essence, such views posit that acquired rights are subject to the discretion of governments which is not much different from saying these are mere ‘political understandings’ devoid of a truly legally binding character. The implication of the view of absolute state sovereignty over such ‘state contracts’7 means, in functional and effect terms, that agreements with host states, in particular those with de-facto state control over their national judiciaries, are essentially a temporary political understanding. This would be less problematic if a foreign investment an investment which is only over long of The host state and such and the is as to host state The of international investment in particular of of to international and most and most investment treaties with be as to such unilateral of the to host state after the investment has been and the effect now and the of to such to from political subject to the discretion of the host to contractual that be under a legal system and host state control and and more to be the for This the of as it the political of resource nationalism and the sustained high the of the of in the and in its political and has in the state This of the of with to rights the state is in contracts between the foreign with the host state or with its state in agreements and in in national investment or and to international The of the of investment protection which substantially during the late 1980s in and investment such as the over investment treaties the or the of that the different views the of of at the of the are the that legal be and that acquired rights be to in that not in the terms of a resource investment for an government power to that be as a of the of or terms (eg in particular have been an to a unilateral the government at least a of of the This is more so if a the of such changes to a foreign and changes may under international investment a of the host state to the of the investment in particular if the the of as of the to provide and if is and changes in not and a or an international may a national are not a of producing countries the the or their and system such the profitability of the (and the of the for which is quite to the price such as the to investment in and (eg or in policies at of the as as and political with to or the environment. In such cases, to with an that the and be and much or of the and with the In such of of and and are or in or is less to investors it would be in of high political and politically for investment protection be and in where the political is as high and where such are in to the political and the to the is as low (ie in to it international and investment protection are less less and protection are most where are as In where is a high political and investment protection the (eg at in a in or investors have to their investment the of an and profitability be to in of their investment with in effect as the price to be for political state and of and political of These have a high much in a where legal of investment protection in a of be are often not to subject to and the of (eg international and investment with the and contractual adaptation under the of the upwards of the resource period of resource with an new legal have been to with the the political in the last The current of as a to the and of the ‘NIEO’ period in the and the International Economic As the these more political have not been able to a of contracts in and and have been able to provide protection to international oil in countries such as or where investment protection would have a from the would have been a of assets new and significantly and ownership the of international with of in of an for the This not be to that the investment protection contractual international and not provide protection at that it not provide the and protection for which it for and which from political and international in a would that the and structure is a mere and has effect in or the of the resource the of host states and the political in which the would that the in national international treaties and international from and are an of as a and for and financial to under the that the the terms of such investment and the the original investment that contracts and rights are of and ‘political are to provide to the in the are fully to the of the host state political and to the political of host and The in is more an that is a for in a (or not under the of in a of the with to legal right be acquired and rights are to the power of those control the and of In such countries is of in is a as those in power the of in with the of the in the and the of the are under the and control of those with political power over the of the state. from the the of in the international is a as to it is truly to the originally negotiated and terms for a national to investment or international the and a of or with their and of and the and the is much of the legal such a of that and in has only a the less the more the and the the in political and the of the and political international The of current (in particular in the of oil, gas and is in the upwards (and of the price cycle in the petroleum and mining have been in the and and are not to the upwards cycle in oil, gas and to the ‘political of towards foreign investment with a towards the privatization policies of the 1990s. In those countries with petroleum or mining renegotiation or and foreign investors be as politically and the mineral to the a fundamental of government and political government did the its to not be to a where a between the government in place at the time of investment and the cases out of a of government a of or or a in the circumstances of an The of an investment is that the terms or and in or the of contractual or a are and a International most national not a of government as a to contractual and a The is that the government has of that the of the government of the in or legally investment terms to if a new government and have and power for if such politically is and be to those newly in the foreign the political of to the The of for investors is particularly acute if the new government a different policy towards private and foreign investment in as oil, and The to oil, gas and mineral most of which has been taken over or late the new government to its policies such as investment and privatization as and the contracts and under the policies and terms of the government the of the new This is The government in reversed its investment policies renegotiation and in in a new government its and to and more to be the much of its with foreign This political of government to a of contracts and and The of such a be a revision of such terms for or it to investment The is the the new government not have the or political to to a with the foreign or the not have the political to that accommodate its and provide to the new of the in host to provide to the it control over to the government the of sovereignty and view the now as a legal that of and is largely to the that it is a and that the of the and the of and control that governments These political the foreign out of a of government it or are the of the to the of host state or in the where is not of This is (and in The that to are the that a between and the be at times a national is not only and a for foreign it is a in the political the government of towards foreign with of and to the is a in The governments which were in the of the resource cycle and in national to pursue an investment is to have a particularly effect in and where the have a or and are and towards states as is the for most of The of internal to a particular and its towards the foreign This is more so if the foreign is to is not that a of government to foreign investors if it is not in the of the state to increase its political of policies and of foreign in terms of a oil or mineral and an between governments that in is an foreign as the of foreign in the and The of an of and the political cycle and the to a more of that acquired rights and a This and of investors not to investors may to foreign investors or as are often much less subject to international and state and much more from the towards the from and in the political international have much less for and with host state and may have in the to the international and the from and financial This not to national have been to those in The are the the and of rights is with the government and those of investment have the between and with in with international of international investors with or often in the of the foreign the of ownership and to times the foreign not be of their have been (or were of ‘political of to with investment in and its with government and is to out such to with those such power with are and the the political and if the is and to a of and with those newly in This an that current power may not be and a of in a with the and political in terms of political power not come to international of investment are as the resource cycle Resource in particular oil and in These may not in a and are such as financial and producing the is that in over time to prices and investment and production over time to to investment and of the prices to a of resource and low prices to and of new to The adaptation of and to prices to be in the resource This is the of the in the of petroleum and is not and only to adjustment with a of The for often more a for new investment to be and of investment is of to if at a so long as is an of production and the are in these in to the high of oil, gas and mining The of the resource to and the and the price The and of the resource to the of the petroleum and In oil, the in often to a policy of production control or prices the would This to the of the most countries in the in particular and to a the states, have or the of international oil in upstream oil and gas This that high prices not the effect of production from as would in a The now state and or and not as private oil under control of the and have to the state’s of or for and the In the oil the gas and much less so the is a of and political of the structure of with of a high oil price and government is to increase production or to investment in is the is with for the international oil are now in for with the state oil from and which are with and able to to be more private to more terms and a political to increase to their at the of the resource the host mineral production and as the between and price be (ie of of production more so that a of production and mineral rent government is for investment state as that are be to the government in a time of high The of such not only state to a the political of the government the to political and in a time of The only policy at time is to private investment international and to state often with financial and a of government and state bargaining power is at the low to at the of the resource cycle (ie the the are have a of and of that such terms have to be as the of most host states that terms not are national investment and to investment protection treaties that are international As the resource cycle and with time the are investment In the governments have extensive have their are from now to and political and to in to production and the of of for the is the of state to and is to or under of and be from The of oil in the late 1980s and early has a of able to provide the and to state oil these were in private oil and not to the state oil International oil are not to to and are to to new or to to host government demands to the now as at the low point of the with from and politically to at of in producing The cycle the political that have in with investment and privatization are now of to and international policies are and as been governments in the of the under such as and The outcome is a international to a of their a to prices and more able to with and government if is of the investment under terms, an legal for the legal of rights acquired in the of the Even the high point of the cycle is is The of the cycle is the of the The high point the for the now of the the cycle is in its production to increase as the of and with and in to high prices and with quite a time a in the is not and to from a price and a price The cycle the political As foreign investors are out and as are investment and is less The rent government and government for the political of the of the of as a have been to a and with the mineral to their political not and their The its The of as the of producing states as and in the of not much to the has been able to pursue a and policy in from oil This is from the of oil and is as a not be the international or The more oil the less is to points in petroleum prices are with low points in terms of and a high of oil for political as the control over oil those the to political oil the for power and are with the for The of oil prices is not is to political of policies and of the of the oil price and political The political of producing states and their from acquired rights and a political cycle of in to the price As for acquired rights or is an for of the political and legal the of of experience to out of rent and the it producing is that the current cycle last the cycle of the explosion of from the and of in and a the current cycle is the of The that is that the the cycle the more acute be the for host states and investors of investment has so far been which to particular of has been of their such and of the for of the of the and the of the of the and or an This is an of investment These are have to with a of with government (and their are and are the The foreign is at times not the of the new a in a the new the government (or in the new government of the and of the investment are if In cases is a a of and in the contractual which is only a and legal is to a of the may have been in the of the and with is in the (eg and international may not the taken the is the original are and or the government has to contractual The state may between the state and its state the state may or the state may the state to a renegotiation of the contractual most the of a of contractual investment protection is not out in terms of which in the be which protection be high the of the and in government and with the it is often not the The foreign may not have extensive experience and that investment may be of its The government new investment at the of the out only so that to the political at the of the investment cycle may and to the are in far in the is of to the and at is a that looks to not in the and the of the may years an of is is only that the investment for investment are more and taken are These are the of the international investment a as would most investment or as such are far high to be in the of and only investors were to be would be for protection at would be for such to be after of has been in most are the of an investment with a new government out to it it in is not politically to accommodate the of the new government for a and of with a foreign the of the This much the of new petroleum and mineral investment at the of the last cycle of resource nationalism in the to with the and new with to the new be that of not with new governments is and in of with in the new is essentially in investment that are these are and often not with from countries where the in particular from the are subject to extensive and are given to to rights to a of and have particular or the is politically and a foreign in is political to be out of the and the of international or that the for the is to an that as a in often such more and to a politically more it has been in investment of the have in a in it is the are not or only contracts in the oil, and are particularly to new governments in an investment In cases, it is for governments to investment in the low of the and (in terms of and investment are may be adaptation (eg resource rent such contracts the low bargaining power of the government in the low of the the cycle government Contracts concluded as a of and at investment in a now to which may or may not have been with the The investment has now a of government The investment has been (in particular petroleum and mineral have been only if such have been and if the quite the has the government not if the to those in particular the high for petroleum and mineral for is an in the are politically is political to be the control over a In private investors to their investment in and The is not to a for a political for government the privatization and investment is to of investment from and the particularly of investment in these the of investment to the ‘NIEO’ which of and the government of the is a of in the current The the to the of the with privatization a unilateral since it the original price in the did not to legal state the the investors have were not significantly at the time in or did not to the contractual of the to from and most the less the the original investors from as a relatively for the government to a relatively The and their to and were not of control or the of their The may have its not it the most and investors In the government to a to new and The an between a and the to the to much in particular from power the In the to with of in the a a state-owned as a in a and be to the the of the of the with of as the The to for the of the it the government for largely of the and government ownership and control over The with the of the and a of the national in the the to not to foreign The that are for the of foreign investors in the government the and often of state (or the only for power and the that for the between state and state-owned The that are to in and which now with privatization and with the of foreign in politically of and investment the of are not to and or government the is so far the where the legal of an investment is a example for the of investment to to the of In a private oil (in particular and a of and with and a and which state to most of assets at a that were and the were an of right in the that a of for such are with the the of the of the and the of the unexpected profitability of the different from the the did not the assets a and in the for to oil were significantly more the and to the new This of political to power acquired political with the in the the of not a and political of the and in a that has and the of of and for rights in In the government a assets a as with a to the The of the of a with The the to a it of the assets at the The is a in the of the is an an in the The not have the political as the it the political The government privatization in a time of to the legal the to its high political The government the of nationalism and foreign privatization This in towards privatization investors to have to the of in particular the and of over This as in the of under the in to as are to be of for over the last has most or foreign oil to a revision of terms the state which significantly the ownership and of foreign This has been under the of unilateral in have been to significantly less terms under the of and of their In the cases, foreign investors were the governments as with more The foreign investors as a fundamental of the were of internal between the the new the and the governments with a and and a in the is an of in the the policies the of the resource cycle and the corresponding political The of a and or towards in the oil and gas have the terms the that it is to to have a in the more petroleum assets with a of and a international under contractual or with of with an with assets that are less are to with the that a in the be to come to a and an in cases, the of the and the in the that the political and cycle and investment the with oil prices and the contracts be such a the which have renegotiation over the of such the legal raised the be that renegotiation is a of the and as to the governments that right the renegotiation out of of the host is not to privatization of the of countries the essentially the and and to of a the to be in with and in the The with the of the as an and unexpected The is of The of mining in under mining is in of the that not the the foreign its rights for such The state in the between and after the has the and and with a The that the mineral are now to a in and countries to a and in cases changes the political and to the the of the of of oil, gas and mineral an that may have that to most of the to protection of acquired the may a of to acquired rights the of and in the of and at be to and the effect the of and in the in This that the of international investment be much with as with the of the of The changes of government and government The to with a of that in a of and of The raised under in particular under that with The reflects the of state of rights to government is an unexpected the is as if the were an under the it reflects a view of rights the of and which be or governments in This has as the arguments have been in the of a government a privatization The that the of rights is not an for or countries the between private investors and states the of which is not in the oil price and in the of the host state in for the an international oil the oil the of the is under most the host state. This is a of high to and a of or in with a and as a rate-of-return-based resource rent an investment that the the of a price a substantial to the oil at if most of the over is away and if the and the have In be the state to a subject to a in its that the upstream oil from the state to the state. a new not to host state in countries with substantial upstream oil and gas The to the of an in the be the state the and contractual the if is from the state politically and with the to the is for that of a of is in a the The has to come from the of the extensive the right of state to of the cases with in the of a government or of This is quite different from the of a in a upstream petroleum as a of of and and with of a The be to international the of International from a private and and from an international of the in particular and to state
Key Findings
1
Contracts lacking balanced internal adaptation mechanisms are especially vulnerable when host states demand politically acceptable redistribution of increased resource rents.
2
Contracts with inexperienced governments, particularly newly independent post-Soviet petroleum states, face pressure when high prices do not produce visibly higher government revenues.
3
Even profitability- or rate-of-return-based fiscal regimes may not prevent renegotiation if their structures reflect unequal bargaining power at contract formation.
4
Governments in petroleum- and mineral-producing countries are broadly revising international investment terms during sustained commodity-price increases.
5
Renegotiation pressures are strongest for contracts concluded during low-price periods, amid policy shifts toward resource nationalism, or after reversals of privatization.
Research Object
International investment contracts and upstream oil, gas, and mining projects in producing countries
Research Subject
Renegotiation of acquired contractual rights and internal adaptation mechanisms under changing commodity prices, political cycles, and rule-of-law constraints
Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-05-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest