Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research

Обратный перевод для межкультурных исследований
Richard W. Brislin
1970-09-01

analysis of varianceback-translationcross-cultural researchequivalence criteriatranslation quality
Two aspects of translation were investigated: (1) factors that affect translation quality, and (2) how equivalence between source and target versions can be evaluated. The variables of language, content, and difficulty were studied through an analysis of variance design. Ninety-four bilinguals from the University of Guam, representing ten languages, translated or back-translated six essays incorporating three content areas and two levels of difficulty. The five criteria for equivalence were based on comparisons of meaning or predictions of similar responses to original or translated versions. The factors of content, difficulty, language and content-language interaction were significant, and the five equivalence criteria proved workable. Conclusions are that translation quality can be predicted, and that a functionally equivalent translation can be demonstrated when responses to the original and target versions are studied.
1
A study with 94 bilinguals across ten languages translating/back-translating six essays (three content areas, two difficulty levels) supported the above conclusions.
2
Five equivalence criteria based on meaning comparisons or predicted similar responses proved workable for evaluating equivalence between source and target versions.
3
Functional equivalence between original and translated versions can be demonstrated by comparing responses to the original and target versions.
4
Translation quality can be predicted using the studied factors (content, difficulty, language, content-language interaction).
5
Translation quality is influenced significantly by content, difficulty, language, and the interaction between content and language.

Translated and back-translated essay versions produced by bilingual participants across ten languages

Factors affecting translation quality and evaluation of functional equivalence between source and target versions (including effects of language, content, difficulty, and their interactions) as assessed by five equivalence criteria

Publication Details
Publication Date
1970-09-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Richard W. Brislin
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%