The barrier between the keratinized mucosa and the dental implant
Барьер между ороговевающей слизистой оболочкой и дентальным имплантатом
1999-10-01
SCID: 54.1/8utg8e8s
Discuss with AI
dental implantfibroblast-rich barrier tissuejunctional epitheliumkeratinized mucosaperi-implant connective tissue
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The present study was performed in order to examine the composition of the connective tissue that forms an attachment to a dental implant. 6 beagle dogs were used. All mandibular premolars were extracted. After 3 months of healing, 6 fixtures--3 in each side of the mandible--(Astra Tech Implants, Dental System TiO blast; Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) were installed. After another 3 months of healing, abutment (Uni-abutment 45; Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) connection was performed and a plaque control program was initiated. The animals were sacrificed and perfused with a fixative through the carotid arteries. Each implant site, including the implant and the soft and hard peri-implant tissues, was dissected, decalcified in EDTA and further processed using a "fracture technique". The specimens were subsequently embedded in EPON, cut with the microtome set at 3 microm and the sections stained in PAS and toluidine blue. From the EPON-embedded blocks, ultra-thin sections were cut and electron micrographs were prepared. The detailed histologic and morphometrical examinations were restricted to a 200 microm wide zone of connective tissue interposed between the apical border of the junctional epithelium and the bone tissue. In the analysis, this zone was further subdivided into 2 different units; (i) one central, 40 microm wide unit (zone A) located immediately next to the implant surface, and (ii) one lateral, 160 microm wide unit (zone B) that was continuous with the central unit. The implant surface apical of the junctional epithelium and coronal of the bone crest appeared to be in direct contact with a connective tissue. Zone A of this connective tissue was characterized by its (i) absence of blood vessels and (ii) abundance of fibroblasts which were interposed between thin collagen fibers. The more lateral zone B contained comparatively fewer fibroblasts, but more collagen fibers and blood vessels. There are reasons to assume that the fibroblast rich barrier tissue next to the titanium surface plays a rôle in the maintenance of a proper seal between the oral environment and the peri-implant bone.
Key Findings
1
A 200 μm connective-tissue zone was identified between the apical junctional epithelium and alveolar bone surrounding the implant.
2
The central 40 μm zone adjacent to the implant surface lacked blood vessels and contained abundant fibroblasts interposed among thin collagen fibers.
3
The findings support the presence of a fibroblast-rich connective-tissue barrier directly adjacent to the implant surface.
4
The lateral 160 μm zone contained fewer fibroblasts but more collagen fibers and blood vessels than the central zone.
5
The study characterized connective tissue attachment between keratinized mucosa and dental implants in six beagle dogs using histology, morphometry, and electron microscopy.
Research Object
connective tissue attachment to a dental implant in the peri-implant mucosa of beagle dogs
Research Subject
the histologic composition and spatial organization of the peri-implant connective-tissue barrier, including fibroblast, collagen-fiber, and blood-vessel distribution
Publication Details
Publication Date
1999-10-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest