EEG datasets for motor imagery brain–computer interface

Наборы данных ЭЭГ для интерфейса мозг–компьютер на основе моторного воображения
Hohyun Cho, Minkyu Ahn, Sangtae Ahn, Moonyoung Kwon, Sung Chan Jun
2017-05-04

EEG datasetsEMG datasetsevent-related desynchronization/synchronizationmotor imagery BCIsubject-to-subject transfer
Background: Most investigators of brain-computer interface (BCI) research believe that BCI can be achieved through induced neuronal activity from the cortex, but not by evoked neuronal activity. Motor imagery (MI)-based BCI is one of the standard concepts of BCI, in that the user can generate induced activity by imagining motor movements. However, variations in performance over sessions and subjects are too severe to overcome easily; therefore, a basic understanding and investigation of BCI performance variation is necessary to find critical evidence of performance variation. Here we present not only EEG datasets for MI BCI from 52 subjects, but also the results of a psychological and physiological questionnaire, EMG datasets, the locations of 3D EEG electrodes, and EEGs for non-task-related states. Findings: We validated our EEG datasets by using the percentage of bad trials, event-related desynchronization/synchronization (ERD/ERS) analysis, and classification analysis. After conventional rejection of bad trials, we showed contralateral ERD and ipsilateral ERS in the somatosensory area, which are well-known patterns of MI. Finally, we showed that 73.08% of datasets (38 subjects) included reasonably discriminative information. Conclusions: Our EEG datasets included the information necessary to determine statistical significance; they consisted of well-discriminated datasets (38 subjects) and less-discriminative datasets. These may provide researchers with opportunities to investigate human factors related to MI BCI performance variation, and may also achieve subject-to-subject transfer by using metadata, including a questionnaire, EEG coordinates, and EEGs for non-task-related states.
1
After bad-trial rejection, the recordings showed established MI patterns: contralateral ERD and ipsilateral ERS in the somatosensory area.
2
Dataset quality was validated using bad-trial rates, ERD/ERS analysis, and classification performance.
3
Reasonably discriminative information was present in 73.08% of the datasets, corresponding to 38 subjects.
4
The datasets include both well-discriminated and less-discriminative subjects, enabling investigation of human factors underlying MI-BCI performance variation and potential subject-to-subject transfer using metadata.
5
The study provides MI-BCI EEG datasets from 52 subjects, supplemented with psychological and physiological questionnaires, EMG recordings, 3D electrode locations, and non-task EEG states.

EEG datasets from 52 subjects for motor imagery-based brain–computer interface research

Variability and discriminative performance of motor imagery BCI, including ERD/ERS patterns and human-factor-related intersubject differences

Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-05-04
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Hohyun Cho
Minkyu Ahn
Sangtae Ahn
Moonyoung Kwon
Sung Chan Jun
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%