Review of Research on Student-Facing Learning Analytics Dashboards and Educational Recommender Systems

Обзор исследований панелей аналитики обучения для студентов и образовательных рекомендательных систем
Robert Bodily, Katrien Verbert
2017-08-15

educational recommender systemslearning analytics dashboardspropensity score matchingstudent-facing reporting systemsusability testing
This article is a comprehensive literature review of student-facing learning analytics reporting systems that track learning analytics data and report it directly to students. This literature review builds on four previously conducted literature reviews in similar domains. Out of the 945 articles retrieved from databases and journals, 93 articles were included in the analysis. Articles were coded based on the following five categories: functionality, data sources, design analysis, student perceptions, and measured effects. Based on this review, we need research on learning analytics reporting systems that targets the design and development process of reporting systems, not only the final products. This design and development process includes needs analyses, visual design analyses, information selection justifications, and student perception surveys. In addition, experiments to determine the effect of these systems on student behavior, achievement, and skills are needed to add to the small existing body of evidence. Furthermore, experimental studies should include usability tests and methodologies to examine student use of these systems, as these factors may affect experimental findings. Finally, observational study methods, such as propensity score matching, should be used to increase student access to these systems but still rigorously measure experimental effects.
1
Evidence is limited regarding effects on student behavior, achievement, and skills, requiring more rigorous experimental studies.
2
Existing research emphasizes final dashboard products, while design and development processes—including needs analyses and information-selection justifications—remain underexamined.
3
Future evaluations should incorporate usability and student-use measures, while observational methods such as propensity score matching can expand access and strengthen causal effect estimates.
4
Studies were coded across functionality, data sources, design analysis, student perceptions, and measured effects.
5
The review analyzed 93 of 945 retrieved articles on student-facing learning analytics reporting systems.

student-facing learning analytics reporting systems and educational recommender systems

their functionalities, data sources, design and development processes, student perceptions, usability, and effects on student behavior, achievement, and skills

Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-08-15
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Robert Bodily
Katrien Verbert
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%