Comparison of D-dimer concentration and thromboelastography for diagnosis of cerebrovascular accidents in dogs: A retrospective study

Сравнение концентрации D-димера и тромбоэластографии для диагностики нарушений мозгового кровообращения у собак: ретроспективное исследование
Elizabeth DiPaola, Starr Cameron, Helena Rylander, Natalia Zidan, Scott Hetzel
2024-02-08

D-dimer concentrationcerebrovascular accidentsdiagnostic sensitivity and specificitymagnetic resonance imagingthromboelastography
BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) in dogs are diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This modality is sometimes unavailable, and CVAs can resemble other lesions on MRI. D-dimer concentration and thromboelastography (TEG) are utilized in human medicine in addition to diagnostic imaging to support diagnosis of CVAs, but their use in veterinary patients has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE: Assess utility of blood D-dimer concentration and TEG in supporting the imaging diagnosis of CVAs in dogs. ANIMALS: Sixty-eight client-owned dogs with neurologic signs that had brain MRI and D-dimer concentration or TEG performed. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective study. The incidence of abnormal D-dimer concentration or TEG was compared between patients with MRI evidence of CVA and a control population. Analysis methods included Fisher's exact test or Chi-squared test for association and comparison of independent proportions. RESULTS: Neither D-dimer concentration nor TEG was significantly associated with a CVA (P = .38 and .2, respectively). D-dimer testing was performed in a low-risk population and showed low sensitivity (30.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-61%) and high specificity (86.4%; 95% CI, 64%-96%) for CVA diagnosis. Thromboelastography was performed in a high-risk population and showed moderate sensitivity (64.3%; 95% CI, 44%-81%) and specificity (66.7%; 95% CI, 24%-94%) for CVA diagnosis. Abnormal D-dimer concentration or TEG were not helpful in differentiating hemorrhagic from ischemic stroke (P = .43 and .41, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although blood D-dimer concentration or TEG alone are not diagnostic of CVAs in dogs, a positive D-dimer result supports additional testing for CVA.
1
Abnormal D-dimer results and thromboelastography did not distinguish hemorrhagic from ischemic stroke (P = .43 and .41, respectively).
2
D-dimer concentration and thromboelastography alone are not diagnostic for canine cerebrovascular accidents, although a positive D-dimer supports additional evaluation.
3
D-dimer testing showed low sensitivity (30.8%; 95% CI, 10%-61%) but high specificity (86.4%; 95% CI, 64%-96%) for canine cerebrovascular accidents.
4
Neither blood D-dimer concentration nor thromboelastography was significantly associated with cerebrovascular accidents in dogs (P = .38 and .2, respectively).
5
Thromboelastography demonstrated moderate sensitivity (64.3%; 95% CI, 44%-81%) and specificity (66.7%; 95% CI, 24%-94%) in a high-risk population.

Cerebrovascular accidents in dogs

The diagnostic utility and performance of blood D-dimer concentration and thromboelastography for detecting CVAs and differentiating hemorrhagic from ischemic stroke

Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-02-08
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
3
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Elizabeth DiPaola
Starr Cameron
Helena Rylander
Natalia Zidan
Scott Hetzel
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%