The Error Function and its Complement: A Comparison of Some Approximate Models

Функция ошибки и её дополнение: Сравнение некоторых приближённых моделей
Kazeem A. Lawal
2009-08-03

Winitzki 2008 modelapproximate modelscomplementary error functionerror functionvan Halen 1989 model
Abstract Applying the conservation laws to the transient transport problems of most processes, including diffusion, heat and momentum transfer, normally yield parabolic partial differential equations which solutions, for semi-infinite systems, usually include either the error function or the complementary error function. While tabulated values are available for real arguments of these functions, the need for look-up tables and interpolations makes them computationally intensive for implementation in computer programs and other applications. Although ‘simple’ models have been fitted to these values, it is imperative that such models preserve the key properties of these functions. Combining the criteria of accuracy, differentiability, and integrability with mathematical consistency, this paper examines the approximate models of Kalkaja (2009), Winitzki (2008), van Halen (1989) and Greene (1989), premised on different assumptions and of varied forms and mathematical elegance. In terms of accuracy, the van Halen (1989) model is the most reliable, successively trailed by Winitzki (2008), Kalkaja (2009), and Greene (1989) models. Despite being the most accurate, the van Halen (1989) model is the most complex and computationally expensive. Although they are all continuous and differentiable, obtaining their derivatives analytically, involves varying complexities, with van Halen (1989) most demanding and Greene (1989), the least intensive. With current knowledge, none of the models is amenable to analytic (direct) integration. Considering all performance indices, while the Winitzki model is the most consistent, van Halen approximation is the least consistent. In conclusion, whereas the accuracies of these approximate models are satisfactory for most engineering applications, their robustness to mathematical (analytic) operations is not convincing. Although there is scope for improvement, it is recommended that greater efforts be directed at the development of theoretically rigorous models, which ironically, may not necessarily be more complex. Typical applications of this work include analysis of reservoirs under thermal or miscible floods.
1
All four models are continuous and differentiable, but analytical derivatives vary in complexity, with Greene (1989) being the least intensive to differentiate.
2
Although these approximations are sufficiently accurate for most engineering applications, they lack robustness to mathematical (analytic) operations, indicating need for more theoretically rigorous models.
3
Considering all performance indices, the Winitzki model is the most consistent overall, and the van Halen approximation is the least consistent.
4
Four approximate models (Kalkaja 2009, Winitzki 2008, van Halen 1989, Greene 1989) are examined against criteria of accuracy, differentiability, integrability, and mathematical consistency.
5
In accuracy ranking, van Halen (1989) is most accurate, followed by Winitzki (2008), Kalkaja (2009), and Greene (1989).
6
None of the examined models is amenable to analytic (direct) integration with current knowledge.
7
Solutions for semi-infinite transient transport problems commonly involve the error function or complementary error function, motivating approximate models.
8
Van Halen (1989) model, while most accurate, is the most complex and computationally expensive to evaluate and differentiate analytically.

The error function and the complementary error function (erf and erfc) as used in solutions of transient transport problems

Comparison and evaluation of approximate models/approximations for erf and erfc with respect to accuracy, differentiability, integrability, mathematical consistency, computational complexity, and suitability for engineering applications

Publication Details
Publication Date
2009-08-03
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Kazeem A. Lawal
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%