The formation of the Eurasian Economic Union: How successful is the Russian regional hegemony?

Формирование Евразийского экономического союза: насколько успешна российская региональная гегемония?
Ksenia Kirkham
2016-04-30

Eurasian Economic UnionEurasian integrationRussian regional hegemonyinstitutional designneo-Gramscian approach
January 2015 witnessed an important step towards further integration in Eurasia, with the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) coming into operation. It comprises three members of the former Eurasian Customs Union (CU), Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan, plus Kyrgyzstan and Armenia. Recent debates on Eurasian integration consider the EAEU to be a Russian hegemonic project in the region. However, the potential of this project is yet to be discovered. This article has pioneered in applying the neo-Gramscian approach to analysing the potential for the EAEU as a Russian counter-hegemonic initiative. The neo-Gramscian understanding of hegemony, which constitutes of four core elements, is reflected in the structure of the article: the institutional design, material capabilities (the capitalist system), security invulnerability (geopolitics) and cultural leadership. The article concludes that Russian regional hegemony has not yet been formed, but has the potential to be completed. Hegemony has been consolidated domestically, and has started outward expansion through the EAEU as its institutional mechanism. However, to succeed with its hegemonic project, the Russian government should not simply copy the EU's institutional design but learn how to present the achievements of integration as successful efforts at creating a strong welfare system that favours key social groups in order to obtain social consent and take cultural leadership. The novelty of the presentation of hegemony as an evolutionary process, which passes through initial, transitional and conclusive phases of its development, along with the recentness of the EAEU as a topic, could make this article a contribution to Eurasian integration studies.
1
Russia should avoid simply replicating the EU’s institutional design and instead frame integration achievements as a welfare system benefiting key social groups.
2
Russian regional hegemony has not yet been fully formed, although it has consolidated domestically and begun expanding outward through the EAEU.
3
Social consent and cultural leadership are identified as necessary for completing Russia’s regional hegemonic project.
4
The EAEU is analyzed as a potential Russian counter-hegemonic project using a neo-Gramscian framework covering institutions, material capabilities, geopolitics, and cultural leadership.
5
The EAEU serves as Russia’s institutional mechanism for extending regional influence, but its ultimate potential remains unresolved.
6
The article conceptualizes hegemony as an evolutionary process progressing through initial, transitional, and conclusive phases.

The Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) as an institutional mechanism of regional integration in Eurasia

The formation, consolidation, and potential success of Russian regional hegemony through the EAEU, including its institutional, material, geopolitical, and cultural dimensions

Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-04-30
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Ksenia Kirkham
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%