Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity
Банковская паника, страхование депозитов и ликвидность
2000-12-01
SCID: 54.1/98cgc4xt
Discuss with AI
bank runsdemand deposit contractsdeposit insuranceliquidity demandmultiple equilibria
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
This article develops a model which shows that bank deposit contracts can provide allocations superior to those of exchange markets, offering an explanation of how banks subject to runs can attract deposits. Investors face privately observed risks which lead to a demand for liquidity. Traditional demand deposit contracts which provide liquidity have multiple equilibria, one of which is a bank run. Bank runs in the model cause real economic damage, rather than simply reflecting other problems. Contracts which can prevent runs are studied, and the analysis shows that there are circumstances when government provision of deposit insurance can produce superior contracts.
Key Findings
1
Bank deposit contracts can generate allocations superior to exchange markets by pooling privately observed liquidity risks.
2
Bank runs cause real economic damage in the model rather than merely reflecting pre-existing underlying problems.
3
Run-preventing contracts are analyzed, and government-provided deposit insurance can produce superior contracts under certain conditions.
4
Traditional demand-deposit contracts support multiple equilibria, including a self-fulfilling bank-run equilibrium.
Research Object
bank deposit contracts and deposit-insurance arrangements
Research Subject
their ability to provide liquidity, generate multiple equilibria including bank runs, cause real economic damage, and prevent runs through government deposit insurance
Publication Details
Publication Date
2000-12-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest