Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity

Банковская паника, страхование депозитов и ликвидность
Douglas W. Diamond, Philip H. Dybvig
2000-12-01

bank runsdemand deposit contractsdeposit insuranceliquidity demandmultiple equilibria
This article develops a model which shows that bank deposit contracts can provide allocations superior to those of exchange markets, offering an explanation of how banks subject to runs can attract deposits. Investors face privately observed risks which lead to a demand for liquidity. Traditional demand deposit contracts which provide liquidity have multiple equilibria, one of which is a bank run. Bank runs in the model cause real economic damage, rather than simply reflecting other problems. Contracts which can prevent runs are studied, and the analysis shows that there are circumstances when government provision of deposit insurance can produce superior contracts.
1
Bank deposit contracts can generate allocations superior to exchange markets by pooling privately observed liquidity risks.
2
Bank runs cause real economic damage in the model rather than merely reflecting pre-existing underlying problems.
3
Run-preventing contracts are analyzed, and government-provided deposit insurance can produce superior contracts under certain conditions.
4
Traditional demand-deposit contracts support multiple equilibria, including a self-fulfilling bank-run equilibrium.

bank deposit contracts and deposit-insurance arrangements

their ability to provide liquidity, generate multiple equilibria including bank runs, cause real economic damage, and prevent runs through government deposit insurance

Publication Details
Publication Date
2000-12-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Douglas W. Diamond
Philip H. Dybvig
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%