closing wedge osteotomyhigh tibial osteotomymedial compartment osteoarthritisopening wedge osteotomyunicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
HTO include the choice of opening vs. closing wedge HTO, graft selection in opening wedge HTO, type of fixation, comparative advantages over unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and the influence of HTO on subsequent knee arthroplasty 6) . Preoperative Assessments 1. Indications and ContraindicationsAppropriate patient selection is a key to a successful HTO.Primary or secondary medial compartment degenerative arthritis is the most common indication for HTO.The ideal candidate for HTO is an individual who is between 60 to 65 years of age with isolated medial osteoarthritis with a varus deformity and good range of motion (ROM) and without ligamentous instability 6) .Poor prognostic factors include severe joint destruction (≥Ahlback grade III), ≥65 years of age, advanced patellofemoral arthritis, <90 o of ROM, ≥15 o of flexion contracture, joint instability and ≥1 cm lateral tibial thrust, ≥20 o of correction, and rheumatoid arthritis [7][8][9] .Most authors agree that HTO is more appropriate than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for overweight patients, but the influence of body mass index on the results of HTO remains controversial 8,10) . Preoperative Planning 1) Patient assessmentPatient's age, career, level of activity, previous history of surgery on the knee, and expectation should be taken into consideration before deciding upon surgery.Closing wedge HTO may be more High Tibial Osteotomy
Key Findings
1
HTO decision-making involves selecting an opening- or closing-wedge technique, graft and fixation strategies, and considering alternatives such as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
2
HTO is generally considered more appropriate than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for overweight patients, although the effect of body mass index on HTO outcomes remains controversial.
3
High tibial osteotomy is primarily indicated for isolated medial compartment degenerative arthritis with varus deformity, preserved range of motion, and no ligamentous instability.
4
Poor prognostic factors include advanced joint destruction, age 65 years or older, patellofemoral arthritis, limited motion, flexion contracture, instability, substantial lateral tibial thrust, large correction requirements, and rheumatoid arthritis.
5
The ideal HTO candidate is approximately 60–65 years old, with good knee motion and isolated medial osteoarthritis.
Research Object
high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis with varus deformity
Research Subject
patient selection, surgical technique choices, prognostic factors, and outcomes relevant to subsequent knee arthroplasty
Publication Details
Publication Date
2012-06-08
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest