International Relations by Proxy? The Kremlin and the Russian Orthodox Church

Международные отношения через посредника? Кремль и Русская православная церковь
George Soroka
2022-03-01

Russian Orthodox ChurchRussian foreign policychurch–state relationscivilizational differentiationtraditional values
Russian officials and the Moscow Patriarchate have worked together in recent years to promote a socially conservative policy agenda, both domestically and beyond the Russian Federation’s borders. Examining official documents and the statements of key leaders, this article evaluates the development and nature of contemporary church–state relations as they pertain to international relations. The picture that emerges is one of pragmatic partnering, with the state increasingly inclining towards normative positions long espoused by the Church in an effort to shift its foreign policy in a direction that stresses civilizational differentiation and positions Russia as the protector of Christians and “traditional values” around the globe. Underlying this shift in orientation on the part of the Kremlin is a neorealist perspective (though one increasingly expressed through ideational rhetoric) that envisions Russia as not just having a privileged regional sphere of influence but becoming a major player in a polycentric world. As a means of legitimating these objectives, the Church has proven an ideal partner; however, it would be a mistake to simply regard the latter institution as an arm of the state, given that it has its own objectives and motivations relative to the wider world, and these at times conflict with those of the Kremlin.
1
Church–state cooperation in international relations is therefore strategic and negotiated rather than fully subordinating the Church to state policy.
2
Russian foreign policy increasingly emphasizes civilizational differentiation and presents Russia as a global protector of Christians and “traditional values.”
3
The Kremlin and Moscow Patriarchate engage in pragmatic partnership to advance a socially conservative policy agenda domestically and internationally.
4
The Kremlin’s shift is rooted in neorealist ambitions for Russia to move beyond a privileged regional sphere and become a major actor in a polycentric world, expressed through ideational rhetoric.
5
The Russian Orthodox Church legitimates the Kremlin’s international objectives but should not be treated merely as a state instrument because it has independent goals that sometimes conflict with the Kremlin.

Contemporary international church–state relations between the Kremlin and the Moscow Patriarchate

The development, nature, and strategic dynamics of pragmatic church–state partnering in Russia’s foreign policy, including convergent and conflicting objectives

Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-03-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
10
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
George Soroka
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%