Legislation, Collective Bargaining and Enforcement

Законодательство, коллективные переговоры и правоприменение
Danielle Venn
2009-07-02

collective bargainingemployment protection indicatorspre-trial conciliationseverance payunfair dismissal
This paper presents updated estimates of the OECD employment protection indicators for 30 OECD countries and 10 emerging economies and considers important aspects of employment protection other than those provided in legislation. Collective agreements often contain provisions relating to employment protection, but in most OECD countries, severance pay and notice periods in collective agreements are similar to those set out in legislation. Where bargaining takes place largely outside individual firms at the national, regional or sectoral level and collective agreements include provisions substantially more generous to employees than those in legislation, they are incorporated into the OECD indicators. Many OECD countries exempt some groups of firms or workers from employment protection rules. Such exemptions have mixed success in promoting employment among exempted groups, but do not have a large impact on the accuracy of the OECD indicators. More than half of OECD countries have specialised courts or procedures to handle unfair dismissal cases, reducing the time taken to deal with cases and improving satisfaction with legal outcomes. Resolving disputes early (either through pre-court dispute resolution procedures or pre-trial conciliation) saves time and money compared with waiting for a court decision. More research and cross-country comparable data are needed on the efficiency of conciliation procedures and the cost of pursuing or defending dismissal cases.
1
Collective-agreement provisions substantially more generous than legislation are incorporated into OECD indicators when bargaining occurs mainly at national, regional, or sectoral levels.
2
Early dispute resolution through pre-court procedures or pre-trial conciliation saves time and money compared with awaiting court decisions, but comparable evidence on efficiency and litigation costs remains limited.
3
Exemptions from employment protection rules have mixed success in promoting employment among exempted groups and do not substantially reduce indicator accuracy.
4
In most OECD countries, collective-agreement severance pay and notice periods closely resemble statutory provisions.
5
Specialised dismissal courts or procedures in more than half of OECD countries shorten case resolution times and improve satisfaction with legal outcomes.
6
The paper provides updated OECD employment protection indicator estimates for 30 OECD countries and 10 emerging economies.

Employment protection systems in 30 OECD countries and 10 emerging economies, including legislation, collective agreements, exemptions, and enforcement institutions

The comparability, coverage, and enforcement effectiveness of employment protection indicators, including the influence of collective bargaining, exemptions, specialized dismissal procedures, and early dispute resolution

Publication Details
Publication Date
2009-07-02
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Danielle Venn
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%