Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification

Миф о молекуле: ДНК-штрихкоды видов не могут заменить морфологию при идентификации и классификации
Kipling Will, Daniel Rubinoff
2004-02-01

DNA barcodesbiological classificationglobal biodiversitymorphological studiesspecies identification
So-called DNA barcodes have recently been proposed to answer the problem of specimen identification and to quantify global biodiversity. We show that this proposition is wanting in terms of rationale, methodology and interpretation of results. In addition to falling short of all its stated goals, the method abandons the benefits of morphological studies in favor of a limited molecular identification system that would ultimately impede our understanding of biodiversity.
1
DNA barcoding does not replace the benefits of morphological studies for species identification and classification.
2
DNA barcoding is inadequate for its proposed goals of specimen identification and global biodiversity quantification.
3
Replacing morphology with a limited molecular identification system could ultimately hinder understanding of biodiversity.
4
The barcode-based proposition has shortcomings in its rationale, methodology, and interpretation of results.

DNA barcodes for species identification and classification

The rationale, methodology, interpretation, and limitations of DNA barcoding compared with morphological studies for specimen identification and biodiversity assessment

Publication Details
Publication Date
2004-02-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Kipling Will
Daniel Rubinoff
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%