Methodologies for Determining the Service Quality of the Intercity Rail Service Based on Users’ Perceptions and Expectations in Thailand

Методики определения качества обслуживания междугородного железнодорожного сервиса на основе восприятия и ожиданий пользователей в Таиланде
Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao, Thanapong Champahom, Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha
2020-05-22

Thailandcluster analysis (CA)factor analysis (FA)gap analysisimportance-performance analysis (IPA)infrastructures/stationsintercity rail servicequality indicatorsservice quality (SQ)staff service qualityusers’ perceptions and expectationsvehicles / train car variables
There is a significant need to change people’s travel mode from personal cars to public rail, because rail transport is a more environmentally friendly travel mode. Over the past decade, the number of rail passengers has reduced because of service quality problems. Thus, this study aims to propose guidelines for precise service quality (SQ) improvements of intercity rail services in Thailand. Data were collected from 615 train passengers by distributing questionnaires at train stations in six provinces, covering all regions of Thailand. Cluster analysis (CA), factor analysis (FA), and importance-performance analysis (IPA) were applied in this research, which were used based on gap analysis. As a result of CA and FA, the 45 quality indicators were grouped into four factors, namely, vehicles, staff, services, and infrastructures/stations. The FA results seem more appropriate than those of CA in terms of providing factor loadings that indicate the importance of each indicator. The results of IPA show that the seven indicators that were analyzed fell into the “concentrate here” quadrant. To summarize the current policy, the factor most in need of rapid improvement in order to increase the quality of the intercity rail service in Thailand is that of the train car variables group; on the other hand, the main strength of the current services relates to the services provided by staff.
1
Cluster analysis and factor analysis grouped 45 service quality indicators into four factors: vehicles, staff, services, and infrastructures/stations.
2
Factor analysis provided more appropriate factor loadings than cluster analysis for indicating indicator importance.
3
Importance-performance analysis identified seven indicators in the “concentrate here” quadrant requiring priority improvement.
4
Staff-provided services represent the main strength of current intercity rail services.
5
Study collected survey data from 615 intercity train passengers across six Thai provinces covering all regions.
6
The train car (vehicles) factor is the aspect most in need of rapid improvement to raise intercity rail service quality in Thailand.

Intercity rail service in Thailand (train operations and facilities used by passengers)

Service quality of the intercity rail service as perceived and expected by users, including vehicles, staff, services, and infrastructure/stations assessed via gap-based importance-performance, factor, and cluster analyses

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-05-22
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao
Thanapong Champahom
Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%