2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative

Критерии классификации ревматоидного артрита 2010 года: совместная инициатива Американской коллегии ревматологии и Европейской лиги против ревматизма
Alan J. Silman, Paul Emery, David T. Felson, Larry W. Moreland, Frederick Wolfe, Daniel Aletaha, Maxime Dougados, Gerd R Burmester, Vivian P. Bykerk, Bernard Combe, Jonathan Kay, Philip J. Mease, T. Huizinga, Tuhina Neogi, Deborah Symmons, Karen H. Costenbader, Jiří Vencovský, Theodore Pincus, Julia Funovits, Clifton O. Bingham, Neal S. Birnbaum, Marc D. Cohen, Gianfranco Ferraccioli, Johanna M. W. Hazes, Kathryn Hobbs, Arthur Kavanaugh, Tore K. Kvien, Timothy Laing, Henri A. Ménard, Raymond L. Naden, Josef S Smolen, Ewa Stanisławska‐Biernat, Paul P. Tak, Katherine S. Upchurch, Gillian Hawker
2010-08-10

2010 ACR/EULAR criteriaAmerican College of RheumatologyEuropean League Against Rheumatismrheumatoid arthritis classification criteriaundifferentiated inflammatory synovitis
OBJECTIVE: The 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR; formerly, the American Rheumatism Association) classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been criticized for their lack of sensitivity in early disease. This work was undertaken to develop new classification criteria for RA. METHODS: A joint working group from the ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism developed, in 3 phases, a new approach to classifying RA. The work focused on identifying, among patients newly presenting with undifferentiated inflammatory synovitis, factors that best discriminated between those who were and those who were not at high risk for persistent and/or erosive disease--this being the appropriate current paradigm underlying the disease construct "rheumatoid arthritis." RESULTS: In the new criteria set, classification as "definite RA" is based on the confirmed presence of synovitis in at least 1 joint, absence of an alternative diagnosis that better explains the synovitis, and achievement of a total score of 6 or greater (of a possible 10) from the individual scores in 4 domains: number and site of involved joints (score range 0-5), serologic abnormality (score range 0-3), elevated acute-phase response (score range 0-1), and symptom duration (2 levels; range 0-1). CONCLUSION: This new classification system redefines the current paradigm of RA by focusing on features at earlier stages of disease that are associated with persistent and/or erosive disease, rather than defining the disease by its late-stage features. This will refocus attention on the important need for earlier diagnosis and institution of effective disease-suppressing therapy to prevent or minimize the occurrence of the undesirable sequelae that currently comprise the paradigm underlying the disease construct "rheumatoid arthritis."
1
A joint ACR/EULAR working group developed new rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria to improve sensitivity in early disease.
2
The criteria classify definite rheumatoid arthritis using confirmed synovitis, exclusion of a better alternative diagnosis, and a score of at least 6 out of 10.
3
The new paradigm emphasizes early disease features associated with persistent or erosive outcomes, supporting earlier diagnosis and disease-suppressing treatment.
4
The revised criteria identify patients with undifferentiated inflammatory synovitis who are at high risk for persistent and/or erosive disease.
5
The scoring system integrates four domains: involved joint number and distribution, serologic abnormalities, acute-phase response, and symptom duration.

Patients newly presenting with undifferentiated inflammatory synovitis

Clinical factors and classification criteria that identify high risk of persistent and/or erosive rheumatoid arthritis

Publication Details
Publication Date
2010-08-10
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Alan J. Silman
Paul Emery
David T. Felson
Larry W. Moreland
Frederick Wolfe
Daniel Aletaha
Maxime Dougados
Gerd R Burmester
Vivian P. Bykerk
Bernard Combe
Jonathan Kay
Philip J. Mease
T. Huizinga
Tuhina Neogi
Deborah Symmons
Karen H. Costenbader
Jiří Vencovský
Theodore Pincus
Julia Funovits
Clifton O. Bingham
Neal S. Birnbaum
Marc D. Cohen
Gianfranco Ferraccioli
Johanna M. W. Hazes
Kathryn Hobbs
Arthur Kavanaugh
Tore K. Kvien
Timothy Laing
Henri A. Ménard
Raymond L. Naden
Josef S Smolen
Ewa Stanisławska‐Biernat
Paul P. Tak
Katherine S. Upchurch
Gillian Hawker
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%