Science and Earth History-The Evolution/creation Controversy
Наука и история Земли — спор об эволюции и сотворении
1989-07-01
SCID: 54.1/9x22a4q4
Discuss with AI
Earth historycreationismevolution-creation controversyevolutionary biologypseudoscience
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
In this comprehensive treatment of the ongoing conflict between creationists and evolutionary scientists, well-known geomorphologist Arthur Strahler carefully examines creationists' claims of scientific evidence for the six-day divine creation of the universe, followed by the catastrophic flood of Noah, as claimed in Genesis. The creationists' arguments are examined and evaluated against the findings of mainstream science in the fields of cosmology, astronomy, geophysics, geology, palaeontology, and evolutionary biology. Updated with a new preface and responses to recent attacks on evolutionary theory, Science and Earth History can serve as both a popular overview of earth history and as a scholarly anecdote to the fictions of creationism once again finding their way into classrooms and universities. Strahler illuminates the controversy by reviewing the philosophy, methodology, and sociology of empirical science, as contrasted with the belief systems of religion and pseudoscience. The author also includes lucid criteria for distinguishing science from pseudoscience, and reviews the great discoveries and developments in science that point to the evolution of life over the earth's three-billion-year history.
Key Findings
1
It provides criteria for distinguishing science from pseudoscience and addresses recent attacks on evolutionary theory.
2
Mainstream scientific findings indicate that life evolved over approximately three billion years, contradicting young-Earth creationist accounts.
3
The book evaluates creationist claims of six-day creation and Noah’s Flood against evidence from cosmology, astronomy, geophysics, geology, paleontology, and evolutionary biology.
4
The book presents a broad overview of Earth history while critically examining the scientific validity of creationist arguments.
5
The work contrasts empirical science’s philosophy, methodology, and sociology with religious belief systems and pseudoscience.
Research Object
the six-day divine creation and Noah's catastrophic flood claims, contrasted with mainstream scientific accounts of Earth history and evolution
Research Subject
the scientific evaluation of creationist claims and the philosophical, methodological, and sociological distinctions between empirical science, religion, and pseudoscience
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest