Science and Earth History-The Evolution/creation Controversy

Наука и история Земли — спор об эволюции и сотворении
Arthur N. Strahler, Gordon L. Herries Davies
1989-07-01

Earth historycreationismevolution-creation controversyevolutionary biologypseudoscience
In this comprehensive treatment of the ongoing conflict between creationists and evolutionary scientists, well-known geomorphologist Arthur Strahler carefully examines creationists' claims of scientific evidence for the six-day divine creation of the universe, followed by the catastrophic flood of Noah, as claimed in Genesis. The creationists' arguments are examined and evaluated against the findings of mainstream science in the fields of cosmology, astronomy, geophysics, geology, palaeontology, and evolutionary biology. Updated with a new preface and responses to recent attacks on evolutionary theory, Science and Earth History can serve as both a popular overview of earth history and as a scholarly anecdote to the fictions of creationism once again finding their way into classrooms and universities. Strahler illuminates the controversy by reviewing the philosophy, methodology, and sociology of empirical science, as contrasted with the belief systems of religion and pseudoscience. The author also includes lucid criteria for distinguishing science from pseudoscience, and reviews the great discoveries and developments in science that point to the evolution of life over the earth's three-billion-year history.
1
It provides criteria for distinguishing science from pseudoscience and addresses recent attacks on evolutionary theory.
2
Mainstream scientific findings indicate that life evolved over approximately three billion years, contradicting young-Earth creationist accounts.
3
The book evaluates creationist claims of six-day creation and Noah’s Flood against evidence from cosmology, astronomy, geophysics, geology, paleontology, and evolutionary biology.
4
The book presents a broad overview of Earth history while critically examining the scientific validity of creationist arguments.
5
The work contrasts empirical science’s philosophy, methodology, and sociology with religious belief systems and pseudoscience.

the six-day divine creation and Noah's catastrophic flood claims, contrasted with mainstream scientific accounts of Earth history and evolution

the scientific evaluation of creationist claims and the philosophical, methodological, and sociological distinctions between empirical science, religion, and pseudoscience

Publication Details
Publication Date
1989-07-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Arthur N. Strahler
Gordon L. Herries Davies
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%