Soil carbon 4 per mille

Углерод почвы: 4 промилле
Genxing Pan, Brendan Malone, José Padarian, Budiman Minasny, Alex B. McBratney, Keith Paustian, Laura Poggio, Vincent Chaplot, Biswapati Mandal, Uta Stockmann, Tor‐Gunnar Vågen, Leigh Winowiecki, I. Yu. Savin, B. P. Marchant, Damien J. Field, Denis A. Angers, Dominique Arrouays, Bas van Wesemael, B.G. McConkey, Adam Chambers, Zueng‐Sang Chen, Kun Cheng, Bhabani S. Das, Alessandro Gimona, C. Hedley, Suk Young Hong, Manuel Martín, Vera Leatitia Mulder, Sharon O’Rourke, Anne C Richer-De-Forges, Inakwu Odeh, V. S. Stolbovoy, Yiyi Sulaeman, Chun-Chih Tsui
2017-01-19

4 per mille initiativeagricultural soilsbest management practicesclimate change mitigationsoil organic carbon sequestration
The ‘4 per mille Soils for Food Security and Climate’ was launched at the COP21 with an aspiration to increase global soil organic matter stocks by 4 per 1000 (or 0.4 %) per year as a compensation for the global emissions of greenhouse gases by anthropogenic sources. This paper surveyed the soil organic carbon (SOC) stock estimates and sequestration potentials from 20 regions in the world (New Zealand, Chile, South Africa, Australia, Tanzania, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria, India, China Taiwan, South Korea, China Mainland, United States of America, France, Canada, Belgium, England & Wales, Ireland, Scotland, and Russia). We asked whether the 4 per mille initiative is feasible for the region. The outcomes highlight region specific efforts and scopes for soil carbon sequestration. Reported soil C sequestration rates globally show that under best management practices, 4 per mille or even higher sequestration rates can be accomplished. High C sequestration rates (up to 10 per mille) can be achieved for soils with low initial SOC stock (topsoil less than 30 t C ha− 1), and at the first twenty years after implementation of best management practices. In addition, areas which have reached equilibrium will not be able to further increase their sequestration. We found that most studies on SOC sequestration only consider topsoil (up to 0.3 m depth), as it is considered to be most affected by management techniques. The 4 per mille number was based on a blanket calculation of the whole global soil profile C stock, however the potential to increase SOC is mostly on managed agricultural lands. If we consider 4 per mille in the top 1m of global agricultural soils, SOC sequestration is between 2-3 Gt C year− 1, which effectively offset 20–35% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. As a strategy for climate change mitigation, soil carbon sequestration buys time over the next ten to twenty years while other effective sequestration and low carbon technologies become viable. The challenge for cropping farmers is to find disruptive technologies that will further improve soil condition and deliver increased soil carbon. Progress in 4 per mille requires collaboration and communication between scientists, farmers, policy makers, and marketeers.
1
Best management practices can achieve 4 per mille or higher SOC sequestration rates, with rates up to 10 per mille in soils initially containing less than 30 t C ha−1.
2
Considering the top 1 m of global agricultural soils, achievable SOC sequestration is estimated at 2–3 Gt C year−1, potentially offsetting 20–35% of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions.
3
Soil carbon sequestration can provide climate mitigation time over the next ten to twenty years while low-carbon and other effective sequestration technologies mature.
4
Soil carbon sequestration rates are highest during the first twenty years after implementing best management practices and decline once soils reach equilibrium.
5
The feasibility of the 4 per mille target varies substantially among regions, requiring region-specific soil carbon sequestration strategies.

Global and regional agricultural soils and their soil organic carbon stocks

The feasibility, capacity, and regional variation of soil organic carbon sequestration at the 4 per mille annual rate under best management practices

Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-01-19
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Genxing Pan
Brendan Malone
José Padarian
Budiman Minasny
Alex B. McBratney
Keith Paustian
Laura Poggio
Vincent Chaplot
Biswapati Mandal
Uta Stockmann
Tor‐Gunnar Vågen
Leigh Winowiecki
I. Yu. Savin
B. P. Marchant
Damien J. Field
Denis A. Angers
Dominique Arrouays
Bas van Wesemael
B.G. McConkey
Adam Chambers
Zueng‐Sang Chen
Kun Cheng
Bhabani S. Das
Alessandro Gimona
C. Hedley
Suk Young Hong
Manuel Martín
Vera Leatitia Mulder
Sharon O’Rourke
Anne C Richer-De-Forges
Inakwu Odeh
V. S. Stolbovoy
Yiyi Sulaeman
Chun-Chih Tsui
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%