Monolithic Endocrown Vs. Hybrid Intraradicular Post/Core/Crown Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth; Cross-sectional Study
Монолитные эндокоронки по сравнению с гибридными реставрациями с внутрикорневым штифтом, культей и коронкой у эндодонтически леченных зубов: поперечное исследование
2021-07-13
SCID: 54.1/aak25qas
Discuss with AI
endodontically treated teethferrule effecthybrid post/core/crownmonolithic endocrownrestorative treatment preferences
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The gold standard for restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth (ETT) with successful clinical longevity requires having minimal invasive preparations and maximal tissue conservation. Many dentists still consider hybrid post/core/crown to be the first choice for restoring ETT. Endocrown is a viable alternative treatment modality to hybrid post/core/crown. This study aims to assess the proper judgment of dentists working in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on the use of monolithic endocrown versus hybrid post/core/crown for restoring ETT. The IRB of Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University (PNU) Institutional Review Board reviewed this study. The questionnaire was validated and electronically distributed. The participants were pre-informed that their responses are completely anonymous and used for professional purposes only. The questionnaire surveyed dentists working in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, about their preference for different ETT restorative modalities at various clinical scenarios. Data were analyzed using One-way ANOVA and t-test. All P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. A total of 275 responses were collected; 61.45% were females and 38.55% males. 56% of them were general practitioners, while 16% were consultants. Prefabricated post/core was the most preferred technique among the participants (18.55%), followed by endocrown (12.36%), and lastly, cast post/core (8.73%). The amount of remaining tooth structure was the most influential in the treatment selection (30.18%), followed by the presence or absence of 1–2 mm ferrule (17.82%). Interocclusal space (12.36%) was the least influential factor. Endocrown recorded 63.27% as the most preferred line of treatment in case of insufficient inter-occlusal space. 40.36% preferred endocrown for patients with occlusal risk factors. The amount of the remaining tooth structure and the tooth position significantly affect the treatment options of the participants. Endocrown was the most preferred treatment modality for restoring ETT for patients with occlusal consideration.
Key Findings
1
Among 275 respondents, prefabricated post/core was the most preferred technique (18.55%), followed by endocrown (12.36%) and cast post/core (8.73%).
2
Endocrowns were preferred by 63.27% of participants when interocclusal space was insufficient and by 40.36% for patients with occlusal risk factors.
3
Remaining tooth structure was the most influential treatment-selection factor (30.18%), followed by the presence or absence of a 1–2 mm ferrule (17.82%); interocclusal space was least influential (12.36%).
4
The amount of remaining tooth structure and tooth position significantly influenced dentists’ restorative treatment choices.
5
This cross-sectional survey assessed Riyadh dentists’ preferences for monolithic endocrowns versus hybrid post/core/crown restorations in endodontically treated teeth.
Research Object
Dentists’ treatment preferences for restoring endodontically treated teeth using monolithic endocrowns versus hybrid intraradicular post/core/crown restorations
Research Subject
The influence of remaining tooth structure, ferrule, tooth position, interocclusal space, and occlusal risk factors on dentists’ selection of restorative modality
Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-07-13
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
32
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest