The Impact of Young Age on Breast Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Влияние молодого возраста на прогноз рака молочной железы: систематический обзор и метаанализ
Zitao Li, Jinming Li, Hongxia Liang, Yongxin Li, Cheng-Rong Zhang, Yuanfang Xin, Jingchuan Qi, Yuyao Tang, Zhoujuan Li, Miaozhou Wang, Zhen Liu, Dengfeng Ren, Yongzhi Chen, Yan Zhang, Zhengbo Xu, Jiuda Zhao
2025-09-26

breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS)disease-free survival (DFS)distant disease-free survival (DDFS)local recurrence-free survival (LRFS)non-young breast cancer (NYBC)overall survival (OS)pathologic complete response (pCR)progression-free survival (PFS)systematic review and meta-analysisyoung breast cancer (YBC)
INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on the impact of young age (≤ 35 or 40) on breast cancer prognosis. In this study, a meta-analysis was carried out on the prognosis of breast cancer in young women. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and key cancer-related international conference proceedings, from their inception to 1st June, 2023, with an update on 15th July, 2023. Studies were included if they reported hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confi-dence intervals (CIs) or presented Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), lo-cal recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and pathological complete response (pCR). This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023459282). RESULTS: The meta-analysis, including 129 studies with approximately 1,065,000 patients, re-ported that young breast cancer (YBC) patients had worse OS (HR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.17 - 1.43; I² = 93%; P < 0.01), DFS (HR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.47 - 1.70; I² = 68%; P < 0.01), BCSS (HR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1·09 - 1.49; I² = 95%; P < 0.01), LRFS (HR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.59 - 2.59; I² = 70%; P < 0.01), DDFS (HR = 1.44; 95% CI: 1.11 - 1.87; I² = 91%; P < 0.01), and PFS (HR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.16 - 2·03; I² = 90%; P < 0.01) and a greater pCR rates than non-young breast cancer (NYBC) patients (odds ratio (OR) = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.16 - 1.82; I² = 87%; P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that, compared with NYBC patients, certain differences were found in the prognoses of YBC patients with different molecular subtypes, regions, and stages. DISCUSSION: This meta-analysis confirmed that YBC patients have worse survival outcomes than NYBC patients, despite having higher pCR rates. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that outcomes varied by molecular subtype, region, and disease stage. These findings underscore the importance of early screening, enhanced patient education, and tailored treatment strategies for YBC patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with YBC had worse OS, DFS, BCSS, LRFS, DDFS, PFS, and greater pCR rates than NYBC patients.
1
YBC patients had higher pathological complete response (pCR) rates than NYBC patients.
2
YBC patients had worse breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) compared to NYBC patients.
3
YBC patients had worse disease-free survival (DFS) compared to NYBC patients.
4
YBC patients had worse distant disease-free survival (DDFS) compared to NYBC patients.
5
YBC patients had worse local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) compared to NYBC patients.
6
YBC patients had worse progression-free survival (PFS) compared to NYBC patients.
7
Young breast cancer (YBC) patients had worse overall survival (OS) than non-young breast cancer (NYBC) patients.

Breast cancer in young patients (young-age breast cancer, YBC)

Prognostic outcomes and treatment response comparisons (overall survival, disease-free survival, breast cancer-specific survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant disease-free survival, progression-free survival, and pathological complete response rates) between young-age and non-young-age breast cancer patients

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-09-26
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
3
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Zitao Li
Jinming Li
Hongxia Liang
Yongxin Li
Cheng-Rong Zhang
Yuanfang Xin
Jingchuan Qi
Yuyao Tang
Zhoujuan Li
Miaozhou Wang
Zhen Liu
Dengfeng Ren
Yongzhi Chen
Yan Zhang
Zhengbo Xu
Jiuda Zhao
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%