"No Soul to Damn: No Body to Kick": An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment
«Нет души, которую можно было бы проклясть, нет тела, которое можно было бы пнуть»: беспристрастное исследование проблемы наказания корпораций
1981-01-01
SCID: 54.1/adc3m2az
Discuss with AI
adverse publicitycorporate deterrencecorporate probationcorporate punishmentequity fines
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Because this Article's arguments are interwoven, a preliminary roadmap seems advisable. First, Section I will examine three perspectives on corporate punishment and will develop several concepts in terms of which corporate penalties should be evaluated. Although this analysis will suggest several barriers to effective corporate deterrence, Section II will explain why a sensible approach to corporate misbehavior still must punish the firm as well as the individual decision- maker. Section III will then evaluate three proposed approaches: (1) the "equity fine,'' (2) the use of adverse publicity, and (3) the fuller integration of public and private enforcement. In addition, it will consider whether anything is gained by prosecuting the corporation in a criminal, as opposed to civil, proceeding. Finally, Section IV will look beyond remedies designed to increase deterrence to the possibility of incapacitative sanctions. This latter inquiry is promoted by recent judicial decisions and legislative proposals that permit courts to place corporations on probation. Interesting questions are thus presented: Can an organization be rehabilitated? If so, what goals should the sentencing court pursue and what remedies can it realistically implement?
Key Findings
1
Corporate probation raises the possibility of incapacitative or rehabilitative sanctions, including questions about organizational rehabilitation, sentencing goals, and feasible remedies.
2
Corporate punishment faces barriers to effective deterrence, requiring evaluation through multiple perspectives and criteria.
3
Despite deterrence difficulties, a sensible response to corporate misconduct must punish both the corporation and the individual decision-maker.
4
It examines whether prosecuting corporations criminally provides advantages over civil proceedings.
5
The article evaluates equity fines, adverse publicity, and stronger integration of public and private enforcement as approaches to corporate sanctions.
Research Object
corporations and corporate misbehavior subject to legal sanctions
Research Subject
the effectiveness, design, and rehabilitative potential of corporate punishment, including deterrent and incapacitative sanctions
Publication Details
Publication Date
1981-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest