Critical Assessment of Analytical Methods for the Harmonized and Cost-Efficient Analysis of Microplastics

Критическая оценка аналитических методов гармонизированного и экономически эффективного анализа микропластика
Barbara E. Oßmann, George Sarau, Silke H. Christiansen, Sebastian Primpke, Win Cowger, Hannah De Frond, Ashok D. Deshpande, Marten Fischer, Erika B. Holland, Michaela Meyns, Bridget A. O’Donnell, Marco Pittroff, Barbara M. Scholz‐Böttcher, Kara J. Wiggin
2020-04-06

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopyRaman spectroscopymicroplastics analysispyrolysis-GC-MSstandardized protocols
Microplastics are of major concerns for society and is currently in the focus of legislators and administrations. A small number of measures to reduce or remove primary sources of microplastics to the environment are currently coming into effect. At the moment, they have not yet tackled important topics such as food safety. However, recent developments such as the 2018 bill in California are requesting the analysis of microplastics in drinking water by standardized operational protocols. Administrations and analytical labs are facing an emerging field of methods for sampling, extraction, and analysis of microplastics, which complicate the establishment of standardized operational protocols. In this review, the state of the currently applied identification and quantification tools for microplastics are evaluated providing a harmonized guideline for future standardized operational protocols to cover these types of bills. The main focus is on the naked eye detection, general optical microscopy, the application of dye staining, flow cytometry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-Ir) and microscopy, Raman spectroscopy and microscopy, thermal degradation by pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (py-GC-MS) as well as thermo-extraction and desorption gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TED-GC-MS). Additional techniques are highlighted as well as the combined application of the analytical techniques suggested. An outlook is given on the emerging aspect of nanoplastic analysis. In all cases, the methods were screened for limitations, field work abilities and, if possible, estimated costs and summarized into a recommendation for a workflow covering the demands of society, legislation, and administration in cost efficient but still detailed manner.
1
It compares visual detection, microscopy, staining, flow cytometry, FT-IR, Raman spectroscopy, py-GC-MS, and TED-GC-MS, including their limitations and applicability to field work.
2
The assessment considers estimated analytical costs where possible, addressing the need for practical and economically feasible microplastic monitoring.
3
The authors recommend combining analytical techniques in a cost-efficient workflow that balances detailed characterization with societal, legislative, and administrative requirements.
4
The review evaluates current microplastic identification and quantification methods to support harmonized standardized operational protocols.
5
The review highlights nanoplastic analysis as an emerging analytical challenge requiring further methodological development.

Analytical identification and quantification of microplastics

The methods’ harmonization, standardization, limitations, field applicability, and cost-efficiency for microplastic analysis

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-04-06
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
492
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Barbara E. Oßmann
George Sarau
Silke H. Christiansen
Sebastian Primpke
Win Cowger
Hannah De Frond
Ashok D. Deshpande
Marten Fischer
Erika B. Holland
Michaela Meyns
Bridget A. O’Donnell
Marco Pittroff
Barbara M. Scholz‐Böttcher
Kara J. Wiggin
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%