ROSICRUCIANISM AND FREEMASONRY
РОЗЕНКРЕЙЦЕРСТВО И ФРАНКМАСОНСТВО
2003-09-02
SCID: 54.1/akkhevhs
Discuss with AI
FreemasonryRosicrucian manifestosRosicrucianismhistorical studiessecret societies
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The main reason why serious historical studies of the Rosicrucian manifestos and their influence have hitherto been on the whole lacking is no doubt because the whole subject has been bedevilled by enthusiasts for secret societies. There is a vast literature on Rosicrucianism which assumes the existence of a secret society, founded by Christian Rosencreutz, and having a continuous existence up to modern times. In the vague and inaccurate world of so-called ‘occultist’ writing this assumption has produced a kind of literature which deservedly sinks below the notice of the serious historian. And when, as is often the case, the misty discussion of ‘Rosicrucians’ and their history becomes involved with the masonic myths, the enquirer feels that he is sinking helplessly into a bottomless bog.
Key Findings
1
A large body of occultist literature incorrectly presumes that Christian Rosencreutz founded a secret society with continuous existence into modern times.
2
Conflating Rosicrucian discussions with Masonic myths further obscures the subject and complicates historical inquiry.
3
Serious historical study of Rosicrucian manifestos and their influence has been hindered by enthusiasts’ assumptions about secret societies.
4
These unsupported assumptions produce inaccurate historical accounts that serious historians generally disregard.
Research Object
Rosicrucian manifestos and their historical influence, in relation to claims about Rosicrucianism and Freemasonry
Research Subject
The historical credibility and development of claims about a continuous Rosicrucian secret society and its entanglement with Masonic myths
Publication Details
Publication Date
2003-09-02
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest