Colchicine in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Колхицин у пациентов с острым коронарным синдромом
Stephen Quinn, John Amerena, Jamie Layland, Ravinay Bhindi, Dion Stub, David Tong, Nay Htun, Philip Roberts‐Thomson, Heath Adams, A. Yong, Melanie Freeman, Nicholas Collins, L. G. Howes, Arthur Nasis, C. Hiew, R. Sriamareswaran, William Wilson, W. van Gaal, Robert Whitbourn, A. Lee, C. Hengel, Kaleab Asrress, Andrew Wilson
2020-08-29

acute coronary syndromeanti-inflammatory therapycolchicinerandomized controlled trialsecondary prevention
Background: Inflammation plays a crucial role in clinical manifestations and complications of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Colchicine, a commonly used treatment for gout, has recently emerged as a novel therapeutic option in cardiovascular medicine owing to its anti-inflammatory properties. We sought to determine the potential usefulness of colchicine treatment in patients with ACS. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 17 hospitals in Australia that provide acute cardiac care service. Eligible participants were adults (18–85 years) who presented with ACS and had evidence of coronary artery disease on coronary angiography managed with either percutaneous coronary intervention or medical therapy. Patients were assigned to receive either colchicine (0.5 mg twice daily for the first month, then 0.5 mg daily for 11 months) or placebo, in addition to standard secondary prevention pharmacotherapy, and were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, ACS, ischemia-driven (unplanned) urgent revascularization, and noncardioembolic ischemic stroke in a time to event analysis. Results: A total of 795 patients were recruited between December 2015 and September 2018 (mean age, 59.8±10.3 years; 21% female), with 396 assigned to the colchicine group and 399 to the placebo group. Over the 12-month follow-up, there were 24 events in the colchicine group compared with 38 events in the placebo group ( P =0.09, log-rank). There was a higher rate of total death (8 versus 1; P =0.017, log-rank) and, in particular, noncardiovascular death in the colchicine group (5 versus 0; P =0.024, log-rank). The rates of reported adverse effects were not different (colchicine 23.0% versus placebo 24.3%), and they were predominantly gastrointestinal symptoms (colchicine, 23.0% versus placebo, 20.8%). Conclusions: The addition of colchicine to standard medical therapy did not significantly affect cardiovascular outcomes at 12 months in patients with ACS and was associated with a higher rate of mortality. Registration: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au ; Unique identifier: ACTRN12615000861550.
1
Adding colchicine to standard secondary prevention therapy did not significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
2
Colchicine was associated with higher total mortality than placebo during 12 months (8 versus 1 deaths; P=0.017), particularly higher noncardiovascular mortality (5 versus 0; P=0.024).
3
In this multicenter randomized trial of 795 ACS patients, colchicine produced fewer composite cardiovascular events than placebo, but the difference was not statistically significant (24 versus 38; P=0.09).
4
Reported adverse effects were similar between colchicine and placebo groups (23.0% versus 24.3%), with gastrointestinal symptoms predominating.
5
The trial evaluated colchicine at 0.5 mg twice daily for one month followed by 0.5 mg daily for 11 months in adults with ACS and angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease.

Adults with acute coronary syndrome and angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease managed with percutaneous coronary intervention or medical therapy

The efficacy and safety of adjunctive colchicine therapy in reducing recurrent ischemic and mortality outcomes during 12-month follow-up

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-08-29
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Stephen Quinn
John Amerena
Jamie Layland
Ravinay Bhindi
Dion Stub
David Tong
Nay Htun
Philip Roberts‐Thomson
Heath Adams
A. Yong
Melanie Freeman
Nicholas Collins
L. G. Howes
Arthur Nasis
C. Hiew
R. Sriamareswaran
William Wilson
W. van Gaal
Robert Whitbourn
A. Lee
C. Hengel
Kaleab Asrress
Andrew Wilson
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%