Easy read and accessible information for people with intellectual disabilities: Is it worth it? A meta‐narrative literature review
Понятная и доступная информация для людей с интеллектуальными нарушениями: стоит ли это усилий? Мета-нарративный обзор литературы
2016-11-16
SCID: 54.1/aupm2myj
Discuss with AI
accessible health informationhealth inequalitiesindividually tailored informationintellectual disabilitiesmeta-narrative literature review
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
BACKGROUND: The proliferation of "accessible information" for people with intellectual disabilities in UK health care has accelerated in recent years, underpinned by policy guidance alongside the recent introduction of mandatory standards. However, questions have been raised as to the impact of such resources as a means of enhancing involvement in health care and addressing health inequalities. OBJECTIVE: To review and synthesize the evidence from different approaches used to evaluate the impact of accessible information for people with intellectual disabilities using a meta-narrative approach. SEARCH STRATEGY: Literature searches were iterative and incorporated formal databases, grey literature and hand searches alongside more intuitive and opportunistic methods. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Included English language papers published before December 2015 described the design and evaluation of written information adapted for adults with intellectual disabilities. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We organized the papers into five groups according to similarity in authors' writing styles and presentation, epistemology and theoretical foundations, aims and methodologies, professional and organizational identities. MAIN RESULTS: The 42 included papers in the five groupings occupied diverse positions on (i) public communication vs individualized materials, (ii) literacy as decontextualized skills vs social practices and (iii) the expertise of patients vs professionals. There was limited evidence for the impact of accessible health information, notwithstanding the potential benefits associated with their creation. CONCLUSIONS: Individually tailored information is more likely to meet personalized health information needs for people with intellectual disabilities. The emergence of different social formations in the creation of accessible information has potential for advancing engagement of diverse groups.
Key Findings
1
Collaborative and diverse social formations involved in creating accessible information may advance engagement among different groups, despite limited demonstrated impact.
2
Evidence demonstrating that accessible health information improves healthcare involvement or reduces health inequalities was limited.
3
Individually tailored information was more likely to address the personalized health-information needs of people with intellectual disabilities.
4
The literature reflected contrasting approaches concerning public communication versus individualized materials, literacy as skills versus social practices, and patient versus professional expertise.
5
The review synthesized 42 English-language papers evaluating written health information adapted for adults with intellectual disabilities.
Research Object
Written health information adapted for adults with intellectual disabilities
Research Subject
The impact and effectiveness of accessible information in meeting personalized health-information needs and enhancing healthcare involvement
Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-11-16
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest