How sustainable is liquefied natural gas supply chain? An integrated life cycle sustainability assessment model
Насколько устойчивы цепочки поставок сжиженного природного газа? Интегрированная модель оценки устойчивости жизненного цикла
2022-06-10
SCID: 54.1/b4u2sby4
Discuss with AI
Aspen HYSYSLNG maritime transportlife cycle sustainability assessmentliquefied natural gas supply chainmulti-region input-output analysis
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Integrating sustainability into the distribution network process is a significant problem for any industry hoping to prosper or survive in today's fast-paced environment. Since gas is one of the world's most important fuel sources, sustainability is more important for the gas industry. While such environmental and economic effects have been extensively researched in the literature, there is little emphasis on the full social sustainability of natural gas production and supply chains in terms of the triple bottom line. This research aims to perform the first hybrid life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) of liquefied natural gas and evaluate its performance from the natural gas extraction stage to LNG regasification after delivery through maritime transport carriers. LCSA is used for estimating the social, economic, and environmental impacts of processes, and our life cycle model included the multi-region input–output analysis, Aspen HYSYS, and LNG maritime transport operations sustainability assessment tools. The results spot the light on the most contributors of CO2-eq emission. It is found that LNG loading (export terminal) is the source that generated the highest carbon footprint, followed by the MDEA sweetening unit with the contribution of 40% and 24%, respectively. Socially, around 73% of human health impact comes from SRU and TGTU units which are the most contributors to the particulate matter emission. Based on the interpretation of life cycle results, the environmental indicators show better performance in the pre-separation unit and LNG receiving terminal representing a sustainability factor equal to 1. In terms of social and economic impacts, the natural gas extraction stage presents the best performance among all other stages, with a sustainability factor equal to 1. Based on this study's findings, an integrated framework model is proposed. Various suggestions for sustainability strategies and policies that consider business sustainability and geopolitics risk are presented.
Key Findings
1
LNG loading at the export terminal produces the highest carbon footprint contribution at 40%, followed by the MDEA sweetening unit at 24%.
2
SRU and TGTU units account for approximately 73% of the human-health impact through their particulate-matter emissions.
3
The assessment integrates multi-region input–output analysis, Aspen HYSYS, and maritime transport sustainability tools to evaluate environmental, social, and economic impacts.
4
The pre-separation unit and LNG receiving terminal show the best environmental performance, while natural gas extraction performs best socially and economically; both are assigned a sustainability factor of 1.
5
The study presents the first hybrid life cycle sustainability assessment of LNG from natural gas extraction through maritime transport and regasification.
Research Object
The liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply chain from natural gas extraction through maritime transport and LNG regasification
Research Subject
The triple-bottom-line sustainability performance and life-cycle environmental, social, and economic impacts of LNG supply-chain stages
Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-06-10
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
26
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest